WP/18887/2006 of M/S. VEERAMANI BISCUIT INDUSTRIES LTD., Vs THE ASST. COMMISSIONER (CT) LTU, HYD, AND 4 OTHERS on 29 December 2022

1. The Asst. Commissioner (CT) LTU, HYD , Chairminar Division, Hyderabad.

2. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner [(CT), ]Panjagutta Divion, Hyderabad.

3. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Govt of A.P., Hyderabad.

4. The Commissioner of lndustries, Govt of A.P

5. Nooreen Agencies P!,t Ltd., Noor Khan Bazar, Sultanapura, Hyderabad, [rep.]y its Managing Directo ry its Managing Directo r

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 o'f the Constitution of lndia [praying ]that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate wrlt or order or direction more particularly in thenature of writ of ltrlandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent [in]canceling the revised eligibility certificate issued to the [petitioner ]dt. [4.9.2OO2]and giving prospective effect to the base [production ]fixed basing on themonetary value and enhancing the base turnover from 1 ['l ]['l ]2.26 lakhs to [141 ]0.78lakhs with retrospective effect by the impugned [proceedings ]in letterNo.10121811711/lD dt. 18.6.2004 and the issuance of revised final eligibilitycertificate in file No.10./21001117311173/lD dt. 18.6.2004 as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded, without authority of law and contrary to the G.O.Ms.No.108 dt.20.5.'1996 and set aside the same and declare that the [petitioner ]is entitled foravailment of the incentives basing on the monitory value w.e.f. 22.1 [1 ][.1 ]998 on thebase turnover of Rs.l 1 12.26 lakhs and also declare that the [petitioners ]baseturnover cannot be fixed at Rs.1410.78 lakhs taking into account the best [year]

production after expansion and also declare that the enhanced base valuecannot be given retrospective effect.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 23749 OF 2006)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedsuspend the operation of the proceedings of the 4th respondent in letterNo.1Ol2l811711llD dt. 18..6.2004 and the revised eligibility certificate issued bythe 4th respondent under file No.10/2/00/'1 1731117311D dt. 18.6.2004 pendingdisposal of the writ petition disposal of the W.P.

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2006(WPMP. NO:23750 OF 2006)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedgrant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the Garnishee Notice issued bythe 1st respondent dt. 2.9.2006 in Form VAT -206 and restrain the 1strespondent from taking any coercive steps for recovery of the disputed demandspending disposal of the W.P.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2007ruVVMP. NO: 105 OF 2007)

Between:

The Commissioner of lndustries, Govt of A.P

...PETITIONERYRESPONDENT IN W.P

AND

'l . M/s. Veeramani Biscuit lndustries Ltd., Kammagudem Village, Turkayamjal,Ranga Reddy District, rep. by its Executive Director Mr. P. Julius - Esooianlrn---_--__-Ranga Reddy District, rep. by its Executive Director Mr. P. Julius - Esooianlrn---_--__-

...RESPONDENT/PETITONER2. The Asst. Commissioner (CT) LTU, HYD , Chairminar Division, Hyderabad.

3. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Panjagutta Divion, Hyderabad.

4. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Govt of A.P., Hyderabad.

5. Nooreen Agencies Pvt Ltd., Noor Khan Bazar, Sultanapura, Hyderabad, rep.by its Managing Director.Nooreen Agencies Pvt Ltd., Noor Khan Bazar, Sultanapura, Hyderabad, rep.by its Managing Director.

( R2 to R5 are not necessary parties in this petition)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pteasedvacate the interim suspension granted by he Hon'ble Court in on 15-9-2006 inWPMP No. 23749 of 2006 in WP No. 18887/2006.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt. BHASKAR REDDY VEMtREDDy t6irrr*.l!.'!r{!+.-r.+a"i'--r.-i!t!-.*--.r!ai.-.'*--i-rr!.

-i:t<;jr.#i,.+Gr*.,*<9

Counsel for the Respondent No 2 to 3: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX (TG)Counsel for the Respondent No.4: cP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCECounsel for the Respondent No.5:--The Court made the following: ORDER

I

THE HON'BLD SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMARANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

WP. No.18887 of 2006

ORDER:(per fhe Hon,ble Si Justice T.Vinod. Kumar)

Learned counser for the petitioner has addressed a letterdt.27.L2.2O22, to the Registrar(Judiciat), High Court for the State ofdt.27.L2.2O22, to the Registrar(Judiciat), High Court for the State ofTelangana, seeking permission of the Court to withdraw this WritPetition, stating that the petitioner has availed the One TimeSettlement Scheme introduced by the State of Telangala forsettlement of disputes.Settlement Scheme introduced by the State of Telangala forsettlement of disputes.

2. In view of tlle above said submission, the Writ petition isdismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

3Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if arry, shallpetitions pending, if arry, shallstand closed in the light of this final order.SD/- K. AMMAJI//TRUE coPYt [ASslsrUEGlsrRAR]SD/- K. AMMAJI//TRUE coPYt [ASslsrUEGlsrRAR]SECTTON oFFICER

To,

t3 ]. Telangana. i'15 33J?" rtr:: t1 ;ommercial [1:! ][0., ][.'-"m ]rax i (TG) 'High red d v, Ad vo courtior cate ro p u tre'state cJor[oUTl 3. Two CCs to Gp for lndustries & Telangana, [OUTICommerce, High Court for State of4. Two CD CopiesTJGJPAi\+(

"-t

II

II

HIGH COURT

DATED:2911212022

1lisr4.JFv^.:_,ORDERo0 2 FEB 2[z]tWP.No.18887 of 2006*'i-^*-\__-:z DISMISSING THE WP

AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.