Telangana High Court

CRLP/11007/2009 of Smt. Kummari Lakshmi Devi, A-2 Vs The SHO., Giddalur P.S., Pakasam District, on 31 December 2009

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.11007 OF 2009 ORDER: This Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioners – accused Nos.2 to 5 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.245 of 2009 on the file of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDYCRIMINAL PETITION No.11007 OF 2009ORDER:

This Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by thepetitioners – accused Nos.2 to 5 seeking to quash the proceedings inC.C.245 of 2009 on the file of the learned Additional JudicialMagistrate of First Class, Giddalur, Prakasam District, arising out ofCrime No.104 of 2009 of Giddalur Police Station, registered for theoffence punishable under Section 498-A read with 34 IPC andSections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. Heard both sides.

3. In view of the nature of allegations and in the circumstancesof the case, the Criminal Petition is disposed of with a direction that thepresence of petitioners 3 and 4, i.e. Accused Nos.4 and 5 shall bedispensed with during trial on appropriate petition being filed and theyshall appear at the time of framing of charges, examination underSection 313 Cr.P.C. and Judgment.

31[st] December 2009Note:Issue copy of the orderwithin three days.

B/o. Rns

___________________

P. SWAROOP REDDY, J.

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDYCRIMINAL PETITION No.10561 OF 2009ORDER:

This Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed seekingto modify the orders dated 27.11.2009 passed by the I AdditionalMetropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in Crl.M.P.No.1011 of 2009in C.C.No.6 of 2002 and permit the petitioner – accused No.88 to leavethe country for a period of eight months from the last week of January,2010 to last week of September, 2010 for pilgrimage on foot byreducing the condition of security deposit of Rs.1,00,000/-.

3. Heard both sides.

4. The petitioner wants to go for pilgrimage by foot. As such,time granted by the Court below till February 2010 may not besufficient. Hence, the time granted vide orders dated 27.11.2009 bythe learned I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad isextended till the end of September 2010. Other conditions imposed bythe learned Sessions Judge, shall remain unaltered.

5. The Criminal Petition is accordingly allowed.

16[th] December 2009Rns

___________________

P. SWAROOP REDDY, J.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead