Telangana High Court
CRP/2335/2014 of PALADUGULA SATYAVATHI, KHAMMAM DIST Vs LANKA RAVI, KHAMMAM DIST AND 2 OTHERS on 30 December 2020
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2335 OF 2014 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against the Order daled.11-02-2014 made
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE [STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA AT ][HYDERABAD]
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF [DECEIVBER]TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2335 OF 2014
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of [lndia, ][against ][the ][Order]daled.11-02-2014 made in 1.A.No.153 of [2013 in ][O.S.No.66 of 2013 on ][the ][file of ][the]Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, [at Kothagudem.]
Betwee n:
Paladugula Satyavathi, W/o Raghavaiah, [aged ][62 ][years, Occ: Agriculture, ][R/o.]Nellipaka Banjar Village, Aswapuram Mandal, [Khammam ][District.]
...Petitioner/Petitioner/Plaintiff
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Lanka Ravi, S/o. Appa Rao, aged 40 [years, ]Occ: [Nil, Rio. Nellipaka ][Banjara]village, Aswapuram Mandal, Khammam District.village, Aswapuram Mandal, Khammam District.
2. Pediredla Rani, W/o ltrlaheshwar Rao, aged [45 ][years, Occ: Housewife, ][Rio.]Nellipaka Banjara village, Aswapuram Mandal, Khammam, [District.]Nellipaka Banjara village, Aswapuram Mandal, Khammam, [District.]
3. Gummalla Vijayalaxmi, W/o. Late Venkata Rama Chandra [Rao, ][aged ][65 years,]Occ: Housewife, Fl/o. Nellipaka Banjara village, Aswapuram [Mandal, ][Khammam]District.Occ: Housewife, Fl/o. Nellipaka Banjara village, Aswapuram [Mandal, ][Khammam]District.
...Respondents/Respondents/Defendants
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. PRABHAKAR [REDDY]
Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI M. SUDHIR [KUMAR]The Court made the following: ORDER
IION'BLI1 Jl-,S'l'lCE G. SItl DI'.\'l
(.IvII, RE\/ISION P[-TITION No.2335 of 201,1
ORDI]It
This revision petition is filed challenging tlie order datedI 1.02.2014. passed by the Principal .lunior Civil Jtrdge. [Kothaguclc-m.]in 1.,\.No.l5l o1'20 13 in O.S.No.66 ol201l \\'hcn the nratter is taken up. it is broLrght to thc noticc ol this( ou11 that O.S.No.(r(r of 20 li itscll'has becn ciisposcd of b1' thc tlial( ()url ()n ll.()S.l()lS. lrr r ieri ol tltc slittte. Itrrll'titt{.1 sLttr ir c: lir'lcljLrdication in this rclisiort petition I hc Cir il Rcvision Petition is accordingll disnrissetl asinll'uctr.Lor.rs. No order as to costs.
Consequently, pending miscellaneor-rs applications. if arr1,. shalI
stand c Ioscci,
sD/- [l.][NAGALAKSHMI]ASSISTAN[T ][REG]TRARSECTION [OFFICER]
//TRUE [COPY//]
To,1The Principal [Junior ][Civil Judge' ][at Kothagude'm' Khammam District']2'd" id il :,i p pr"nr'axat'Ceoov' novocat"- lgIU [Cf]
2a. i"" iC,iisn [tv ][sudhir ][Kumar' Advocate ][[oPUC]]a. i"" iC,iisn [tv ][sudhir ][Kumar' Advocate ][[oPUC]]
. Two [CD CoPies]
\
HIGH COURTGSDJ
DATED:3011212020
$E [si.q])Eo/(oo1 ? .tAr'l 2021zai.L*oPAT
ORDERCRP.No.2335 of 2014
DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITIONAS INFRUCTUOUS4