Telangana High Court
WA/2572/2005 of M/s.Mount Paradise Bar AND Restaurant, H.No.1-7-228, Vs The Commissioner of police, Hyderabad City, on 23 December 2005
SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL Nos. 2572 and 2573 of 2005 Between: M/s Mount Paradise Bar & Restaurant and another .. Appellants AND The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City & Others. .. Respondents :: COMMON JUDGMENT :: Counsel for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
HONOURABLE SRI G.S. SINGHVI, THE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT APPEAL Nos. 2572 and 2573 of 2005Between:M/s Mount Paradise Bar & Restaurant and another
AND
.. Appellants
The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City & Others.
.. Respondents
:: COMMON JUDGMENT ::
Counsel for the Appellants : Sri T.Amarnath GoudCounsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HOME.
23rd December, 2005
Per G.S. Singhvi, CJ
These appeals are directed against order dated 9.11.2005 passed by the learnedSingle Judge whereby he disposed of the writ petitions filed by the appellants withthe direction that respondent No.1 i.e. Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad Cityshould consider and pass appropriate orders on the representations made by thepetitioners (appellants herein) for being allowed to have live band/orchestra in theirBar and Restaurant.
Learned counsel for appellants complains that respondent No.1 has so far notpassed orders on the representations made by his clients and at the same time, hissubordinate staff are interfering with their activities of running Bar and Restaurant.
Learned Government Pleader says that respondent No.1 is seized with therepresentations made by the appellants. He request that two weeks further time maybe allowed to the officer to pass appropriate orders in compliance of the directiongiven by the learned Single Judge. He further gave out that the authoritiesconcerned will not interfere with the running of Bar and Restaurant by theappellants.
In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel, the appeals aredisposed of with the direction that respondent No.1 shall pass appropriate orders onthe representations of the appellants within a maximum period of two weeks from today. Till then, the appellants shall be allowed to carry on their activities inaccordance with the licenses granted for running Bar and Restaurant. Therespondents shall also not interfere with the activity, if the appellants use live bandor other instruments of music in the Bar or Restaurant. However, if other activitiesare carried out in the Bar or Restaurant, the authorities concerned shall be free totake appropriate action in accordance with law.
If the appellants feel aggrieved by the orders which may be passed byrespondent No.1, then they shall be free to avail appropriate legal remedy.
G.S. SINGHVI, CJ
23[rd] December, 2005
R. SUBHASH REDDY, J