Telangana High Court
CC/1054/2009 of Mr.Yerabolu Chandrasekhar Reddy Vs Smt.C.R.Padma on 29 December 2010
L. NARASIMHA REDDY Contempt Case No.1054 of 2009 ORDER: This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents have deliberately flouted the judgment rendered by this Court in Second Appeal No. 647 of 2003, dated 19.7.2005. This Court ordered notice to all the respondents. Subsequently,
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents havedeliberately flouted the judgment rendered by this Court in Second AppealNo. 647 of 2003, dated 19.7.2005.
This Court ordered notice to all the respondents. Subsequently, thecontempt case was dismissed against respondent Nos. 2 to 5. Notice uponrespondent No.1 could not be served on account of the fact that she is said tohave migrated to Hyderabad. The petitioner is yet to secure her correctaddress. The contempt case cannot continue. If the petitioner is so advised,he can file a fresh contempt case against the 1[st] respondent duly furnishingthe correct address.
Hence, the contempt case is closed without prejudice to the right of thepetitioner to file a fresh contempt case against the 1[st] respondent with correctaddress. There shall be no order as to costs.
DATE: 29[th] December, 2010
_______________________
L. NARASIMHA REDDY,J
pnb