Telangana High Court

WP/23909/2019 of Alakuntla Rajashekar Rao Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others on 31 December 2021

Cites 0, Cited by 0

j 3,%1,?i" :,H[ Bl,l"1!o, " o *o '*''it*Bi,l5,H"r'JXi,f r#.RiyDEcErvBER THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTTCE SHAMEEM AKTHER PRESENT WRIT PETI toNN S:2 918 ND 23909 0F 201 Between: Alakunila Rajashekar Ra<contracror, ci" n r.i" ztiEi, fil?..f

n *' o,gT: j j 3,%1,?i" :,H[ Bl,l"1!o, "

'' o,gT: j j o *o3,%1,?i"

'*''it*Bi,l5,H"r'JXi,f [r#.RiyDEcErvBER]

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTTCE SHAMEEM AKTHER

WRIT PETI toNN S:2 918

ND 23909 0F 201

W,P.No.23918 of 2019

Between:

Alakunila Rajashekar Ra<contracror, ci" n r.i" ztiEi, fil?..f i,:t:,,T,rt?ifl:*,ifl:i,ii_"",;r1#:?jfuS.o";u?:t,

AND

...PET|T|oNER

l The state of relangana, Rep. by its Principal secretary, IVlunicipal AdministrationDepartment, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

, |Hfli:SffiWarangal [Municipar ][Corporation, Waransat, Rep. ][by ][its]|Hfli:SffiWarangal [Municipar ][Corporation, Waransat, Rep. ][by ][its]

' Itl"rrt Tr:t''tend in g Engineer, G reater wa rangal Municipat corporation,

4. The Executive Engineer, Greater Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal.The Executive Engineer, Greater Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal.

5. The District Collector, Warangal Urban Warangal District.The District Collector, Warangal Urban Warangal District.

6. The Chief [planning ]Officer, Warangal Urban District.Officer, Warangal Urban District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition Under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High coirt inr"y o" pr""r"oto issue writ order or direction especially one in the Nature of writ of Mandamusdeclaring the action of the respondents in not paying the amounts for the workcompleted by the petitioner i.e. laying of internal cc Roads in Vijayanagar colony,Beside vegetable IVarket, Kazipet in Division No.53 in prr.uan"'e of ["Agreement]No.Roc.No.E112357412016 dt.29-04-2017 is illegal, arbitrary and violative-of article19 (1)(g) of the constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the respondents torelease the admitted amounts together with interest for the completed entered in theI\/easurement Book lA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directthe respondents to release the admitted bill amount in respect of the work executedby the petitioner i.e, laying of internal CC Roads in Vijayanagar Colony, BesideVegetable l\,4arket, Kazipet in Division No.53, pending disposal of the main writpetition.the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directthe respondents to release the admitted bill amount in respect of the work executedby the petitioner i.e, laying of internal CC Roads in Vijayanagar Colony, BesideVegetable l\,4arket, Kazipet in Division No.53, pending disposal of the main writpetition.

W.P.NO: [23909 OF ][2019]

Between:

il'ifli'"?iB;'?l1lt's*.i::e,:a,T[:,\3:,i1? [i'3;i'i['Siii ]']flnSX'l'-?i,.;l?:'J: ...PETITIONER

...PETITIONER

AND

1. ' The D;;;'ffi;;i State [of ][Telangana' ]s"iieia,"iai Buiidinss' [Rep ][by its PrincipJl-,Secretary' Municipal Administration][Hvderabao']

2. The [Greater ][Warangal Municipal Corporation' Warangal ][Rep' ][by ][its]Commissioner'Commissioner'

3.TheSuperintendingEngineer'GreaterWarangalMunicipalCorporation'Warangal.Warangal.

4.TheExecutiveEngineer,GreaterWarangaltl,4unicipalCorporation,Warangal.

5.TheDistrictCollector,WarangalUrbanWarangalDistrict.

6. The Chief [Planning Officer, Warangal Urban District]

..RESPONDENTS

Petition Under [Article ][226 ][of ][the ][Constitution ][of ][lndia ][praying ][that in ][the]Circumstancesstatedintneaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleased1o l;;r; writ [order ][or ][direction especially ][one in ][the ][Nature ][of ][writ ][of ][Mandamus]au.f uti"g the [action ][of the ][respondents ][in ][not paying ][the ][amounts ][fo-r ]^th.e [,work]""rpl"t"O E.p.i\o.KAZ [by the ]eruf [OS ][petitioner ][and ][opp. ][Transformer ][i,e ][laying ][lo ][of ][- ][30-2-2311A, ][CC ][^Road ][Bhavani Nagar, Kazipet ][from ][H ][No ][25-B-17l2 ][to][in]in [pursuance ][of ][Agreement ][No.C.No.3/E3/1954412016 ][dt.08-05-2017 ][is]W.f.'fo.gS and [violativJ ][of Article 19 (1) (g) ][of the ][Constitution ][of ][lndia ][and]itiegat, aroitriry direct [the ][respondents ][to ][release ][the ][admitted amounts together ][with]corisequently interest for the work completed [entered ][in ][the ][lvleasurement ][Book.]

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that [in ]the [circumstances ][stated ][in]the affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court may be [pleased ][to ]directthe respondents to release the admitted bill amount in respect of the work executedby the petitioner i.e. laying of CC Road from H.No.25-B-1712 1o E.P.No.KAZ BNK 05and opp. Transformer 1o 30-2-2311A, Bhavani Nagar, Kazipet in W.No.35, pendingdisposal of the main writ petition .

Counsel for the in both Writ Petitions : SRI.CH.RAVINDER

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 in both Writ Petitions: GP FOR MUNCIPALADMTNtSTRATTON URBAN DEVELOpMENT (TG)

Gounsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 & 6 in both Writ Petitions:

M/s. P. LAKSHMI

Counsel for the Respondent No.s in both Writ Petitions: G.p FOR REVENUEThe Court made the following COMMON ORDER

THE HON,BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

RITT TFCOMMON ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that thesubject matter oF these Writ Petitions has become infructuous.

2. Recording the saidsubmission, the Writ petitions aredismissed as infructuous.

lYiscellaneous petitions, if dfly, pending in these WritPetitions shall stand closed.There shall be no order as to costs.

SD/-K.SAILESHI

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To1. Two CCs to GP for l\,4uncipal Administration Urban Devlopment, High Court forthe State of Telangana. [OUT]1. Two CCs to GP for l\,4uncipal Administration Urban Devlopment, High Court forthe State of Telangana. [OUT]2. Two CCs to GP for REVENUE (TG) ,High Court for the State of Telangana.lourllourl

3. One CC to SRI.CH.RAVINDER, Advocate [OPUC]

4, One CC to lvl/s. P. LAKSHtUI, Advocate (OPUC)

5. Two CD Copies6. One Spare copy6. One Spare copy 5A+

rts

HIGH [COURT]

DATED:31 [11212021]

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

COMMON ORDER

WP.Nos.23918 AND 23909 of 2019

DISMISSING THE W.P'S

AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS

e-1il'; [s'i4],4:oIliJB 1 FLT2ii22i.',/n

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead