Telangana High Court

WP/41087/2014 of H.R.Ranganath Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 December 2014

Cites 0, Cited by 0

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.41087 of 2014 Date:31.12.2014 Between: H.R.Ranganath, S/o Hanumanthappa ..... Petitioner And: The State of Telangana., reptd by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Hyderabad and three others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDYWRIT PETITION No.41087 of 2014Date:31.12.2014

Between:

H.R.Ranganath,S/o Hanumanthappa

..... Petitioner

And:

The State of Telangana., reptd by its PrincipalSecretary, Civil Supplies Department,Hyderabad and three others.

.....Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri P.Narahari Babu Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Civil Supplies (TS)

The Court made the following:ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to setaside proceedings in Rc.No.B/368/2014, dated08.09.2014, of respondent No.4, whereby he hassuspended the petitioner’s fair price shop authorization.

At the hearing, learned Assistant GovernmentPleader for Civil Supplies (Andhra Pradesh) has notdisputed that under the A.P. State Public DistributionSystem (Control) Order, 2008 existing as at present,respondent No.4 has no power or authority to suspend theauthorization of the fair price shop dealer. He has,however, submitted that for the month of January, 2015,release order has already been issued in favour of the in-charge dealer.

In the light of the fact that the impugned order passed by respondent No.4 is without jurisdiction, thesame is set aside as the release order is stated to havebeen issued in favour of in-charge dealer in pursuance ofthe patently illegal order, respondent No.4 is directed toforthwith cancel the release order and issue the releaseorder in favour of the petitioner.

Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition isallowed.

As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition,W.P.M.P.No.51461 of 2014 filed by the petitioner forinterim relief is disposed of as infructuous.

___________________________

JUSTICE

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY

31[st] December 2014DR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead