Telangana High Court
WP/26032/2006 of T. Buma Goud S/o Bala Goud Vs The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, on 22 December 2006
Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.26032 OF 2006 DATED: 22-12-2006 Between : T. Buma goud … Petitioner And 1. The Proh. & Excise Supdt., Nizamabad District and another. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.26032 OF 2006 ORDER : The order
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
WRIT PETITION NO.26032 OF 2006
DATED: 22-12-2006
Between :
T. Buma goud … Petitioner
And
1.The Proh. & Excise Supdt., NizamabadDistrict and another. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINIWRIT PETITION NO.26032 OF 2006
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The order impugned in this writ petition is passed under Section31 (1)(b) of the A.P. Excise Act, 1968 suspending the petitioner’slicence pending enquiry.
Against the said order, an alternative remedy of appeal isavailable under Section 63 of the A.P. Excise Act, 1968. Withoutexhausting the said alternative remedy, the petitioner cannot maintainthis writ petition.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed granting leave andliberty to the petitioner to work out the alternative remedy of appeal. Ifany such appeal is preferred within two weeks from today, the sameshall be considered and decided on merits as expeditiously aspossible preferably within a period of four weeks thereafter. No costs._______________
Dt. 22-12-2006 gbsNote: - CC in 3 days.