Telangana High Court
CC/1149/2016 of MOHD. OSMAN, SECBAD Vs B.R. MEENA AND 3 OTHERS on 29 December 2023
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO coNTEMPT CASE NO: 1149 OF 2016 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the
[ [33031]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF [TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
coNTEMPT CASE NO: 1149 OF 2016
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of [Contempt ][of ][Courts ][Act, ][1971 ][to]punish the respondent for his wilful and disobeying/deliberate/violating of the Ordersof the High Court dated 1310412016 [passed ][in in ][W.P.MP.No.15534 ][of ][20'16 ][in]W.P. No.12394 of 2016
Between:
Mohd. Osman, S/o. Late Mr.M.A.Razzak, aged about 55 [years, ][R:/o. ][H.No.1-19-1]to 3, Guntroop Bazaar, Rasoopura Village, Secunderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. B.R. [Vleena, Princrple Secretary, State of Telangana Revenue [Department,]Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2. N.B.Vishnu Sagar, The M.R.O. cum Tahsildar, Secunderabad [Mandal, ][Opp.]Bharani Complex, Minister Road, Secunderabad.Bharani Complex, Minister Road, Secunderabad.
3. U.Raghu Ram Sarma,, The Rvenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad [Mandal,]Opp. Bharani Complex, [\Iinister Road, Secunderabad.Opp. Bharani Complex, [\Iinister Road, Secunderabad.
4. Rahul Boija, The District Collector, Hyderabad District at Nampally,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
5. Haseena Begum,, IvIRO-cum-Tahsildar, Secunderabad Mandal, Opp. [Bharani]Complex, Minister Road, Secunderabad.Complex, Minister Road, Secunderabad.
6. K.Chandrakala,, Revenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad Mandal, Opp.Bharani Complex, Minister Road, Secunderabad.Bharani Complex, Minister Road, Secunderabad.
7. Dr.Yogita Rana,, District Collector, Hyderabad District , Nampally, Hyderabad.
R5 to R7 impleaded as per the Honorble Court Order dtd.25.01 .2018 inAppl.No.979 ol 2017 in CC No.1 149 of 2016.
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. V RAMCHANDER [GOUD (NOT PRESENT)]
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR [REVENUE]
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J, SREENTVAS RAOCONTEMPT CASE No.1149 of2Ot6
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The contempt case is frled seeking to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 1 2 of the Contempt ofCourts Act, 197 | , for deliberate and willful disobedience inimplementing the interim order passed by this Court inW.P.M.P.No.15534 of 20 16 in W.P.No.12394 of 2016, dated13.04.2016.
No representation on behalf of the petitioner in representation on behalf of the petitioner in on behalf of the petitioner in behalf of the petitioner in of the petitioner in the petitioner in petitioner in in the
2. No representation on behalf of the petitioner in representation on behalf of the petitioner in on behalf of the petitioner in behalf of the petitioner in of the petitioner in the petitioner in petitioner in in themorning ald afternoon sessions. Heard learned AssistantGovernment Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf ofrespondents.
This Court while admitting Court while admitting admitting the writ petition grantedwrit petition grantedpetition grantedgranted
3. This Court while admitting Court while admitting admitting the writ petition grantedwrit petition grantedpetition grantedgrantedinterim order on 13.O4.2016 in W.P.M.P.No.15534 of 2016 inW.P.No.12394 of 2016 directing the respondents not tointerfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitionerover the subject land without follorving due process of law.
4. Respondent No.2 irled counter [affidavit, u'herein, ][it ][has]been speciltca111, stated that [subsequent ][to ][the interim ][order,]on 22.09.2017 a notice was issued under [Section ][7 ][of ][the]A.P.Land Encroachment Act, [1905 (for ]short ["thc ][Act") ][directing]the petitioner to submit explanation. [Thereafter, ][he ][passed]order under Section 6 of the Act vide [File ][No.t)/10124 ]l2Ol5dated 05. 10.20 17 and also conducted [patrchanama ][on]09.lO.2Ol7. A copy of the [proceeding ][dated ][05.10.20 ][17 ][has]been enclosed along with the counter affidavit.
4.
5. In view of the compliance of the order datcd [13.O4.2016 ],no further adjudication is required.
Accordingly, the Contempt Contempt Case is closccl is closccl closccl [[. ][Hon'ever, ][the]][[Hon'ever, ][the]][[the]]
6. Accordingly, the Contempt Contempt Case is closccl is closccl closccl [[. ][Hon'ever, ][the]][[Hon'ever, ][the]][[the]]petitioner is granted liberty to avail the rctncdics as [are]available under law, if so advised.
To,
Pending miscellaneous applications, if [:ln,v, ]shall [stald]
closed
SD/. M. MANJULADEPUW REGIS
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
1. One CC to SRl. [V ][RAMCHANDER GOUD' Advocate ][[OPUC]]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR [REVENUE, ][High ][Court ][for ][the ][State of ][Telangana]lourllourl
3. Two CD Copies
\-jz\
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2911212023
ORDER
CC.No.1149 of 2016
THE CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSEDWITHOUT COSTS
1A
4ItiY\!