Telangana High Court
WA/2016/2013 of Varri Satyanarayana, Vs Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited, on 31 December 2013
JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.A.No.2016 of 2013 Date: 31.12.2013 Between: Varri Satyanarayana .....Appellant AND Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P., Limited, Customer Service Centre, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, represented by
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
W.A.No.2016 of 2013
Date: 31.12.2013
Between:
Varri Satyanarayana
.....Appellant
AND
Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P.,Limited, Customer Service Centre, Tadepalligudem,West Godavari District, represented by its ExecutiveEngineer and others
...Respondents
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
W.A.No.2016 of 2013
JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta )
This writ appeal has been filed by the writ petitioner againstthe judgment and order of the learned single Judge dated04.12.2013, by which the learned single Judge granted the reliefsetting aside the impugned order and thereafter directed respondentNo.2 to conduct further enquiry in pursuance of the certificateissued in L.Dis.No.453/2013 (B) dated 22.04.2013 and submit areport to the Assistant Divisional Engineer, OSD/Rural/APEPDCLabout the location of bore well whether it is in the land of thepetitioner or in the land of respondent No.3 and on such report,respondent No.1 shall take appropriate action for grant of electricityconnection to the writ petitioner in terms of Section 43 of theElectricity Act, 2003.
We are of the view that the learned single Judge has grantedthe relief, which was asked for and further granted the relief to takea fresh decision. Thus, we do not find any reason to interfere withthe same.
Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed. Miscellaneouspetitions, if any, pending shall also stand closed. No order as tocosts.
___________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
__________________
SANJAY
KUMAR, J