Telangana High Court
WP/33914/2022 of K. Narsimha Reddy Vs Telangana State Southeran Power Distribution Corporation Limited on 30 December 2022
HIGH COURT FOR TIIE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWO PRESENT TIIE HON'BLE SRI JTJSTICE K. SARAI'H WRIT PETITION NO: 33914 OF 2027 Betrveen: K. Narsimha Reddy, S/o. K. Narayana Reddy, Occ: Agriculture,
HIGH COURT FOR TIIE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWOPRESENT
TIIE HON'BLE SRI JTJSTICE K. SARAI'HWRIT PETITION NO: 33914 OF 2027
Betrveen:
K. Narsimha Reddy, S/o. K. Narayana Reddy, Occ: Agriculture, R./o. H.No.1-63,Komatibanda, Dharmareddipally Village, Gajwel Mandal, Medak District.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. Telangana State Southeran Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Rep by itsChairman cum Managing Director, Central Secretariat, Kiairtabad, Hyderabad.Chairman cum Managing Director, Central Secretariat, Kiairtabad, Hyderabad.
2. The Superintending Engineer- Operation, TSSDCL, Siddipet, Siddipet District
3. The Divisional Engineer, TSSPDCL, Siddipet, Siddipet District.
4. Assistant Engrneer, TSSPDCL, Gajwel, Siddipet District.
5. The Collector, Siddipet District.
6. The Tahsildar, Gajwal Mandal Siddipet District.
RR 5 & 6 are impleaded as per C.O. 0911212022 inI.A.No.212022.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ ofMandamus declaring the action of the respondents nos. 2 to 4 in not providing electricityservice connection to petitioner in respect of his house property bearing H.No.2-52,situated at Komatibanda Village, Gajwel Mandal, Siddipet District, based on petitioner'sapplication dated 26-07 -2022 as being illegal arbitrary and violative of Sec.43 ofElectricity Act, 2003 apart fiom violative of Article 14 and 2l of the Constitution ofIndia and consequently direct the respondents nos. 2 to 4 to provide electricity servicecomection to petitioner's H.No.2-52, situated at Komatibanda Village, Gajwel Mandal,Siddipet District, based on petitioner's application dated, 26-07 -2022; IA NO: I Ots 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct therespondents nos.2 to 4 to provide electricity service connection to petitioner's H.No.2-52, situated at Komatibanda Village, Gajwel Mandal, Siddipet District, based onpetitioner's application dated 26-07 -2022; ( ounsel lirr thr Pctitioner :SItl. KATIKA RAVINDEIt REDDY
( ounscl lirr thc lksponttcnt f ios. I to {: ll VINOD REDDY(SC f-OR I.STRANSCO)Counscl for thc Respondent llos.5 & 6: [(lP ]FOR REVENUE
I hc CoLrrt rnaJr-' thc lollrrq in'-:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.33914 of 2O22
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for the following relief:
"....to issue urit, order or direction more particularlgone in the nature of Wit of Mandamus, declaring theaction of the respondents Nos.2 to 4 in not prouidingelectricity seruice connection to the petitioner in respect ofhis house propertg bearing H.No.2-52, situated atKomatibanda Village, Gajwel Mandal, Siddipet Distict,based on the petitioner's application dated 26.07.2022 asbeing illegal arbitrary and uiolatiue of Sec.43 of ElecticityAct, 2O03 apart from uiolatiue of Article 14 and 21 of theConstitution of India"
2. Heard Sri Katika Ravinder Reddy, Learned Counsel appeadng for the for the petitioner and Sri R,Vinod Reddy,Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondentNos.1 to 4. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposedof at the stage of admission itself.
I
)
3. In [view ][the ][submissions ][made ][by the ][Learned ][Counsel]for the petitione: [as ][well ][as the ][Learned ][Standing ][Counsel']without [going ][irrto ][merits of the ][case' ][this ][Writ ][petition ][is]disposed of [with ][a ][direction to ][the respondents ][to ][dispose ][of]the representaticn [d,ated ][26 ][07 ]['2022 ][fi\ed ][by the ][petitioner']within four [wee ][ks ][from ][the ][date ][of ][receipt ][of ][copy ][of ][this]Court
4Miscellaneous [applications, ][if ][any, ][shall ][stand ][closed]There shall [no ][t,r'der ][as ][to ][costs']
SD/- MOHD. SANAUITIAH ANSARIASSISTANT REGISTRAR,TITUE COPY/i I
SECER
To,1. The Chairman cum \4anaging Director,Telangana State Southeran Power DistributionCorporation Limiter., Central Secretariat, Khairtabad, Hyderabad.
2. The Superintending Engineer- Operation, TSSDCL, Siddipet, Siddipet District
3. The Divisional Engrneer, TSSPDCL, Siddipe! Siddipet District.
4. Assistant llnginee;:, ISSPDCL, Ciajwel, Siddipet District.
5. One CC to SRI. Kl TIKA RAVINDER REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
6. One CC to SRl. It \ I\OD REDDY(SC FOR TSTRANSCO) Advocate IOPUC]
7. Two CCs ro GP IrO [( ]REVENUI:, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]
8. Two CD Copies
FII(;H COt,R-t-
SK,.II)ATUD:30r l2l2022
oRI)ERl tiE [SI4]^o11JAl{2023i'.\*f'/.. I r..-?ol;;Wl'.No.3-l9l,l of 2022
WRIl'PETITION IS I)tiJPOSED OF WITHOUT COSTS