Telangana High Court
WP/6869/2003 of CH.V.SATYANARAYANA NIDADOVOLE W.G.DT Vs SUB POST MASTER NIDADONOLE WG.DTAND2 ORS on 28 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO WRIT PETITION NO : 6869 of 2003 Between: Ch. V. Satyanarayana, S/o. Ch.Sriramulu NSC Agent, No.552, R/o.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO
WRIT PETITION NO : 6869 of 2003
Between:
Ch. V. Satyanarayana, S/o. Ch.Sriramulu
NSC Agent, No.552, R/o. 2-2-7, Ganapathi Center, Nidadovole, West Godavari District – 534 301
..... PETITIONER
AND
1. The Sub Post Master, Nidadovole, West Godavari District.
2. The Head Post Master, Kovvur, West Godavari District.
3. The Special Tahsildar, District Collector’s Office, Eluru, West GodavariDistrict.District.
4. The District Collector, Eluru, West Godavari District.
(R-4 is impleaded as per Court order in W.P.M.P.No.16953 of 2003 dated11.07.2003)11.07.2003)
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1[st] respondent in not acceptingthe deposits made through the petitioner with NSC No.552 and not makingnecessary endorsements for the grant of loan by banks without any proceedingseither suspending or canceling the license as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory andmalafide and violative of Arts 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and with aconsequential direction to the respondents to accept the deposits made through thepetitioner.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.SREERAMACHANDRA MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&2: Mr. A. RAJASEKHAR REDDY, SC FORCENTRAL GOVERNMENT
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3&4: THE GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following ORDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of thiscourt to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
________________B.Prakash Rao, J
Date: 28.12.2004
Ka
To
1. The Sub Post Master, Nidadovole, West Godavari District.
2. The Head Post Master, Kovvur, West Godavari District.
3. The Special Tahsildar, District Collector’s Office, Eluru, West GodavariDistrict.District.
4. The District Collector, Eluru, West Godavari District.
5. Two CCs to G.P for Revenue, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT)6. Two CD Copies6. Two CD Copies