Telangana High Court
WP/12304/1997 of Pullamala Papaiah Vs Insepctor of Fishiries on 29 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 12304 of 1997 Between: Pullamala Papaiah S/o Pitchiah R/O Annaram, Penpahad Mandal,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION NO : 12304 of 1997
Between:
Pullamala Papaiah S/o Pitchiah R/O Annaram, Penpahad Mandal, Nalgonda District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Insepctor of Fishiries, Suryapet, Nalgonda District.
2 Fisherman Co-operative Scoiety, Nagulapati Annaram, Penpahad Mandal, Nalgonda District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, order or direction particularly in the nature of a Writ ofMandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not enquiring into the affairsof 2nd respondent with regard to carrying out of fishing operations by secondrespondent in Benami and to sell the fish directly to the Benami outsiders instead ofcarrying out fishing operations through its members and sell the same forthemselves as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to allowmembers mentioned in Annexure to carry out fishing operations for the period 1996-97 commencing from the June, 97 during this fasli and sell the same for themselvesalong with other members of the society.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.PRABHAKAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: The GP FOR FISHERIES
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Mr.S.Bharat Kumar The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri Sudersan Reddy, Advocate, representing Sri.P.Prabhakar Rao learned counselfor the petitioner, states that the writ petition became infructuous. The said submission is hereby recorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.
Dated : 29[th] December, 2004.
______________
P.S.NARAYANA, J
Sh
To
1 The Insepctor of Fishiries, Suryapet, Nalgonda District.2 2CCs to the G.P.for Fisheries, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT).
4 2CD copies.