Telangana High Court
WP/10407/2003 of Gajula Venkata Narasaiah Vs Srikakuleswara Swamy Devasthanam, on 10 June 2003
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 10407 of 2004 Between: G.V.S.N. Murthy, S/o. G. Musalaiah, Assistant Engineer (Electrical),
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU
WRIT PETITION NO : 10407 of 2004
Between:
G.V.S.N. Murthy, S/o. G. Musalaiah,
Assistant Engineer (Electrical),
O/o. EE, TLC/Ring Mains Division,
Mint Compound,
Hyderabad,
Presently R/o. H.No. 7-7-45/4, Kumidvalli Road, Narsaagraharam, Near by Sujata Hospital, Bhimavaram.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1. Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd.
Rep. by its General Manager (Personnel), Vidyuth Soudha, Hyderabad.
2. The Executive Engineer,
T.L.C./ Ring Mains Division, Mint Compound, Hyderabad.
3. Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd.
Rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director, Vidyuth Soudha, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Page 1 of 2
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ ofMandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the retiral andpensionary benefits to the petitioner though he retired on 28-2-2003 andconsequently direct the respondents to pay the same together with interest at therate of 24 % per annum from 1-3-2003 till the date of payment.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.S.SATYAM REDDYCounsel for the Respondents: MR.S.RAVINDRANATH, Standing Counsel forA.P. Transco.
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The petitioner is a retired employee. He approached this Court with a grievancethat the respondents are not releasing his pensionery benefits, though heretired on 28-02-2003 and he sought for a direction to the respondents to pay allhis pensionery benefits.
2. It is represented on behalf of the respondents that subsequent to the date offiling of the writ petition all the amounts due to the petitioner were disbursed on24-07-2004, by way of Demand Draft.
3. In view of the representation on behalf of the respondents the writ petition isclosed. No order as to costs.
___________
05-08-2004
LSK/SH
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The General Manager (Personnel),Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd.Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd.
Vidyuth Soudha, Hyderabad.
2. The Executive Engineer,
T.L.C./ Ring Mains Division, Mint Compound, Hyderabad.
3. The Chairman & Managing Director,
Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd.
Vidyuth Soudha, Hyderabad.
4. Two C.D. copies
SECTION OFFICER
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…