Telangana High Court

WP/27732/2005 of M/s. Rukminis International Restaurant AND bar, H. No. Vs The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, on 28 December 2005

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION NO.27732 OF 2005 DATED:28.12.2005 Between: M/s.Rukmini’s International Restaurant & Bar H.No.1-8-563/2, 1st Floor, Opp.Sandhya Theatre, RTC X Road, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Licensee Mr.S.Maheshwar S/o.Late Malkaiah …Petitioner And The

WRIT PETITION NO.27732 OF 2005

DATED:28.12.2005

Between:

M/s.Rukmini’s International Restaurant & Bar H.No.1-8-563/2, 1[st] Floor, Opp.Sandhya Theatre, RTC X Road, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Licensee Mr.S.Maheshwar S/o.Late Malkaiah …Petitioner

And

The Commissioner of Police,

Hyderabad City, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad

and others

…Respondents

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO

WRIT PETITION NO.27732 OF 2005

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The petitioner is a firm which obtained a licence from excise authorities in form – 2Bto run a bar and restaurant in the name and style of M/s.Rukmini’s International Bar& Restaurant. Alleging that the first respondent is insisting upon the petitioner toobtain a licence under Section 3(h) of the Hyderabad City Police Act, 1348 fasli, thepetitioner filed the present Writ Petition seeking a direction to the respondents not tointerfere with the business of the petitioner including the entertainment provided byhim by engaging a live band/orchestra during working hours of the restaurant.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned GovernmentPleader for Home. During their submissions, it is brought to the notice of this Courtan order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.2572 and 2573 of 2005, dt.23.12.2005 directing the Commissioner of Police to consider therepresentation of the appellants/petitioners within a period of two weeks and alsofurther directing not to interfere with the activities of the appellants/petitionerstherein.

Therefore, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the first respondent forappropriate orders in terms of the judgment of the Division Bench referred tohereinabove. As and when such representation is made, the first respondent shallconsider the same and pass appropriate orders within a period of two weeks fromtoday. If the petitioner is engaging live-band and orchestra, there shall be nointerference. However, this order does not enable the petitioner bar to arrange anytype of dances at the bar and restaurant.

The Writ Petition with the above observations is accordingly disposed of.

_______________

28.12.2005 (V.V.S.RAO, J)

Note:Issue CC today.(B.O)bnr

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead