Telangana High Court
WP/22004/2003 of M. Kalidas Vs The State of A.P., on 29 December 2011
Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION No.22004 OF 2003 Dated: 29.12.2011 Between: M. Kalidas … Petitioner And 1. The State of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad, A.P., And 3 others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
WRIT PETITION No.22004 OF 2003
Dated:29.12.2011
Between:
M. Kalidas … Petitioner
And
1. The State of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary,Revenue Department, Hyderabad, A.P., And 3 others. … Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
WRIT PETITION No.22004 OF 2003
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action of therespondents in allowing the other notary advocates to practice within theSomajiguda area in Hyderabad as arbitrary and illegal.
As could be seen from the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, thepetitioner was granted permission to practice as Notary on 11.09.2000 initially for aperiod of 3 years and it appears that the same was renewed for a further period of 5years. Thus it is clear that even the period of renewal is expired in the year 2008 itself.
Hence, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and accordingly theWrit Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Dt. 29.12.2011
gbs
_____________
G. ROHINI, J.