Telangana High Court
WP/33055/2021 of Ms. Elizabeth Rani Vs UNION BANK OF INDIA on 30 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY , THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIV1BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 33055 OF 2021 Between: AND Ivls. Elizabeth Rani, W/o.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE [STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA](Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY [OF ][DECEIV1BER]TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY [ONE]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI [JUSTICE ][UJJAL ][BHUYAN]
AND
THE HONOURABLE SMT [JUSTICE P.MADHAVI ][DEVI]
WRIT PETITION NO: 33055 [OF 2021]
Between:
Ivls. Elizabeth Rani, W/o. Yesuratnam [Moguluri, ][Age. ][36 ][years' ][Occ ][Business,]R/o.H.no.5-44i 147, R R [Nagar, Nagaram ][Post, ][Hyderabad, ][Telangana ][State,]Pin 500083.
.,,PETITIONER
AND
UNION BANK OF lNDlA, [(Erstwhile-Coperation Bank),Sainikpuri ]{q1ch,Dr.A.s.Rao Nagar, Secunilerabad, [Represented by ][its ][Authorized ][Officer,]Sri.J.Shankar Rao S/o. J. [Panduranga ][Vittal]
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 [o'f ][the ][Constitution ][of ][lndia ][praying ][that in ][the]circumstances stated in the affidavit [fited therewith, ][the ][High Court may ][be ][pleased]to issue a writ, order or Direction [more padicularly one in the nalure of ][wRlT ][oF]MANDAMUS declaring the action [of ][the ][Respondent bank in ][issuing ][the ][NOTICE ][TO]THE BORROWER INFORN/lNG [ABOUT SALE (SALE ][NOTICE ][under ][RULE 6(2) ][and]8(6) of SECURTTY INTEREST [(ENFORCEMENT) ][RULE 2002) ][on ][01-12-2021 for]dispossessing and taking [possession ][of the ][petitioners property, ][AII ][the ][Residencial]lndependent House On Plot Bearing [No. ][147, admeasuring 200.0 sq.yards ][or ][167 ][0]sq.lr,itrs (lncluding Plinth Area [1400 ][sq.fts ], [RCC ][in ][Ground Floor) ][in ][Survey ][No ][466]and 46,7, situated at Dammiguda [H/0 ][Nagaram ][Village, ][Grampanchayat]Dammaiguda Mandal Keesara, [Ranga Reddy District ][and ][bounded ][as ][follows]North. Land of Guman Reddy, South.Plot [No.148, ][East. ][20 ][Wide ][Road, ][West ][Plot]No.146. is illegal, arbitrary, [violation ][of ][principles ][of ][Natural Justice ][and ][violation of]Fundamental Rights [guaranteed ]Under [the constitution ][of ][lndia ][and contrary ][to ][the]provisions of SARFAESI Act and set aside the same and [consequently ][direct ][the]respondents not to d ispossess/interfere with the [peaceful possession ][of ][the]petitioner's property from the above premises.
IA NO: 10F 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that [in the ][circumstances ][stated ][in]the affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court may be [pleased ][to ][stay ][of]all further [proceeding ]to interfere disposes [from ][the ][petitioner's ][All the ][Residential]lndependent House On Plot Bearing No. 147, admeasuring [200.0 sq.yards ][or ][167.0]
sq.Mtrs (lncluding Plintl Area 1400 sq.fts, RCC in Ground [Floor) ][in ][Survey ][No.466]& 467, situated at Dam niguda H/O Nagaram Village, Grampanchayat [Dammaiguda]Mandal Keesara, Rang r Reddy; District and bounded as [follow:; ]. [North. Land of]Guinan Reddy, South Plot No. 148, East.20'Wide [Road, ]West [Plot No. ][146,]pending disposal Of ma I Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitior er: SRl. NAGESHWAR RAO PUJARICounsel for the Respor dent: SlR. METTU SRINIVAS REDDYThe Court made the fol owing: ORDER
I
I\
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [UJJAL ][BHUYAN]
HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE [P. ][MADHAVI DEVI]
W.P.No.33055 of 2021
Q1(fu1; Q'er [Hon'hh ][Si.lutiu ][L!ljal ][tlhuyan)]
Mr. Srinath [Reddy, leamed counsel ][for ][the ][petitioner, ][and]F{eard lr4r. NlSrinivas Reddy, [leamed counsel ][for ][the ][respondent/union ][Bank ][of]India.
2. By filing this petition [under ][Anicle ][226 ][of ][the ][Constitution ][of]India, petitioner has [challenged ][the ][legality ][and validity ][of ][the ][notice]dated 01.12.2021 [issued ][to ][him ][by ][respondent whereby, ][petitioner ][has]been informed thar [the ][secured ][asset ][would ][be ][sold ][byauction or ][even ][by]private sale byfixing [the ][reserve ][price ][at ][Rs.58'60,000.00']
l. \7e find from the documents [on ][record ][that ][as ][per ][the ][respondent,]the outstanding liabilities of [the ]Petitioner [as ][on ][05'10'2019 ][is]Rs.48,91,142.00.
4. Leamed counsel for [the petitioner ][submits ][that ][even after ][this ][date,]substantial payments [have been made ][bythe ]Petltloner'
5. From the above, [whar ][is ][evident ][is ][that ][respondent ][has ][taken action]against the petitioner [under ][the ][provisions ][of ][the ][Securitisation ][and]Reconstruction of [Financial ][fusets ][and ][Enforcement ][of ][SecuriryInterest]Act,2Oa2 [(for ]shon the [SARFAESI ][Act) ][read ][with ][the provisions ][of ][the]Interest [(E ][nforcement) ][Rules, 2002.]Security
6. Under Section [17 ][of ][the ][SARFAESI ][Act, ]Petidoner [has ][got ][an]adequate and efficacious [remedy. ][ve ][are, ][therefore, ][of ][the view ][that]petitioner should be [relegated ][to ][the ][forum of ][altemative remedy']
..;._;,_.*
7. In [the ][light ][lf ][the ][above, ][we ][grant ][liberty ][to ][the petitioner ][to ][file]Securitisation [App ication ][under Section ][17 ][of ][the ][SARFAESI ][Act ][before]the .iurisdictional [l)ebts ][Recovery ][Tribunal ][within ][a ][period ][of thiny ][dap]from today [and ][il ][the ][same ][is so ][filed, ][it ][shall ][be ][considered ][on ][its ][own]ment.
8. Further, wr [direct the petitioner ][to ][deposit ][10% ][of ][the ][outstanding]Iiabilities [within ][a ][period ][of four ][weels ][from ][today']
9. Subject to [the ][above, respondent ][is ][directed ][not ][to ][take ][funher]steps Pu6uant [tc ][the impugned ][notice ][datedOl'12'2021']steps Pu6uant [tc ][the impugned ][notice ][datedOl'12'2021']
10. However, [f ][there is ][any ][default on the ][Paft ][of ][the ][petitioner' ][either]in approaching [r ][ne ][jurisdictional Debts ][Recovery ][Tribunal ][or ][in ][making]the deposit [as ][at ][ove, respondent ][shall ][be at ][libeny ][to ][proceed ][against ][the]Petltloner [ln ][acc ][)][rdance ][with ][law.]in approaching [r ][ne ][jurisdictional Debts ][Recovery ][Tribunal ][or ][in ][making]the deposit [as ][at ][ove, respondent ][shall ][be at ][libeny ][to ][proceed ][against ][the]Petltloner [ln ][acc ][)][rdance ][with ][law.]
11. [lWrit ]Pet [tion ][is, ][accordingly, disposed ][of' ][Related ][interim]application [is ][ais ][I ][disPosed ][of.]
12. No costs.
sD/- [N ][ciltls*trifttts.ltR]sriiilir'r [oFFrcER]
//TRUE [COPY//]
To,
rstwhi,e-CoP [eration]INDIA, [(E]Shankar [Rao]1.7he Authorize [I]Officer, [UN][ ION BANK ].A.s.Rao [Naga][OF][ r, ][Secund]erabad, [Sri ][J]SainikP [t][ri ][Branch, ][Dr]SainikP [t][ri ][Branch, ][Dr]Bank),S/o, [J][ Pandu ][anga Vittal]One C[Cto][ S ][i,I, ][NAGESHWAR ][RAO ][PUJARI Advocate IOPUCI]S/o, [J][ Pandu ][anga Vittal]One C[Cto][ S ][i,I, ][NAGESHWAR ][RAO ][PUJARI Advocate IOPUCI]
3. One [CC ][to ][SF ][I ][METTU SRINIVAS ][REODY ][Advocate ][[OFU][ CI]
4. Two [CD coPit s']
5. One [spare ][cc )Y']
GB
.\t*
NPJ
HIGH COURT
DATED:3011212021
ORDERt [t'.6]ai o/,'\WP.No.33055 [('f ]2021,)22 [J$'r! ][2!122]
DISPOSING OI: THE WPWITHOUT COI iTS.
@,.r,rr-,, til,t *