Telangana High Court
WP/17922/2000 of Gottipati Sambasiva Rao, Vs The District Collector, on 24 December 2007
SRI JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU W.P.No.17922 of 2000 Date: 24-12-2007 Between: Gottipati Sambasiva Rao and others Petitioners And The District Collector, Guntur, and others Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU W. P. No. 17922 of 2000 ORDER: 1. The writ petition is filed stating
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
W.P.No.17922 of 2000Date: 24-12-2007
Between:Gottipati Sambasiva Rao and others Petitioners
And
The District Collector,Guntur, and others Respondents THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
ORDER:
W. P. No. 17922of 2000
1. The writ petition is filed stating that the action of the respondents intrying to evict the petitioners from Ac.0-12 cents in Survey No.369/1 ofVinukonda village, near Karampudi, Guntur District without providingalternative sites to them is arbitrary and illegal.
2. The learned Judge who admitted the writ petition had passed ordersin W.P.M.P.No.22776 of 2000, dated 22-09-2000 granting interim stay ofeviction of the petitioners.
3. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, it is statedthat during the pendency of the proceedings, the writ petitioners voluntarilyremoved the encroachments in the first week of June, 2003 and that theDeputy Executive Engineer, Roads & Buildings, Vinukonda wrote a letterto the Mandal Revenue Officer on 25-06-2003 stating that the encroachersremoved the platforms in front of the shops which are falling in Roads andBuildings boundary voluntarily. In view thereof, the petition becomesinfructuous.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order asto costs.
________________
C.Y.SOMAYAJULU,J