Telangana High Court
WP/28067/2007 of Govada Jyotirmayi W/o Radhakrishnamurthy Vs The District Collector, on 28 December 2007
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 28067 of 2007 28.12.2007 Between: Govada Jyotirmayi … Petitioner AND The District Collector, Guntur District & others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri N. Sreerama Murthy Counsel for the respondents : Assistant Government
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 28067 of 2007
28.12.2007
Between:
Govada Jyotirmayi
… Petitioner
AND
The District Collector, Guntur District & others … Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri N. Sreerama Murthy Counsel for the respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“ Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleasedto issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in thenature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of therespondents in issuing Rc.No. 3417/06/G2 dated 30.09.2006allegedly a notification under Section 4(1) and also theconsequential issuance R.C. No. 3417/06/G2 dated 17.02.2007under Section 5-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquiremy land of an extent of Ac.1.08 cents in S.No. 102/3 and Ac.0.92cts. In S.No. 102/2 totalling an extent of Ac.2.00 cents or 0.809hectares of wet land in Amrataluru Village & Mandal of GunturDistrict as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and opposed to theprinciples of natural justice and quash the said acquisitionproceedings.”
After arguing the case for some time, learned counsel for thepetitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one with proper pleadings.
The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writpetition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayermade.
As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn,W.P.M.P.No. 36694 of 2007 filed by the petitioner for interim relief isalso dismissed.
28.12.2007
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
ksld