Telangana High Court
WP/26691/2010 of T. NAGA MOHAN REDDY E.G. DIST. Vs THE DIST. COLLECTOR E.G. DIST. AND 5 ORS. on 30 December 2010
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26691 of 2010 Between: T. Naga Mohan Reddy ..... Petitioner AND The District
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.26691 of 2010
Between:
T. Naga Mohan Reddy
..... Petitioner
AND
The District Collector,East Godavari District & others.
.....Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner: None
The Court made the following :
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.26691 of 2010
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief:“… Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an order or writ one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action ofthe respondents 1 to 4 in not taking action againstrespondents 5 and 6 in not stopping construction of Arches(pillered entrance) on the both sides of Z.P. Road and R&Broad which is leading to Kakinada from Ravulapalem viaJonnada-Alamuru at Jonnada Centre, Alamuru Mandal, EastGodavari District causing lot of inconvenience to the villagersand vehicles and not removing the same as arbitrary, illegal,unjust and unconstitutional.”
On 25.11.2010, this Court has adjourned the matter, as no oneappeared for the petitioner. Even today, when the matter is called,there is no representation for the petitioner. It is therefore reasonableto presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing his cause inthe Writ Petition.
The Writ Petition is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution.
As a sequel to dismissal of the Writ Petition for non-prosecution,WPMP.No.34067 of 2010 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is alsodismissed.
____________________________
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, JDate: 30.12.2010ES