WRIT PETITION 46716 of2022 on 30 December 2022

ORDER:

This Contempt Case is [llled by ][rhe ][petitioner to ][punish ][the]under [Sections ][l0 ][tc ][12 ][ol ][the ][Contempt ][of ][Courts]rcspondents Act for wilful, [w-anton ][and ][deliberate rlisobedience of ][the ][orders of]this Court dated 3O. [12.2022, passed ][in ][W ][P.No 467 16 ][of ][2022']

2. tlcarcl fulrs.RaLn:1rl.laia. [lcar.ttt'd ][counscl ][representing]on beha-lf of learl-,t:d [cct-r11se ][i for thc ][petitioner ][Smt'K'Rajya]Lakshmi and Sri [N.Santosh ][Kurrtar. learned ][Assisternt]Govet.nm.ent Plcadcr, [rcpI.c ][scnti ][t ][):{ ][lca ][[necl ][Goverrt ][ment ][Pleader ][for]Seryices-I.

Writ Petition No.467l6 Petition No.467l6 ot [[2O2?. ][l'as ]][[l'as ]][[filcd ][by ][i-he]][[by ][i-he]][[i-he]]

3. Writ Petition No.467l6 Petition No.467l6 ot [[2O2?. ][l'as ]][[l'as ]][[filcd ][by ][i-he]][[by ][i-he]][[i-he]]p(.titjoner seeking ls!;uancc [0l ][\\/rit ][oI ][Martdelmusrn ][cleclaritig ][the]acl:ion of the 2'xr respondcnt [in ][not ][ft'ru'arding ][his ][rrredical]reimburserrrent bills [i.c]

isr

to the Medica_l Board as illegal, arbitrary, irrational and violativeof principles of natural justice and consequently to direct therespondents to forthwith sanction the bills and send it to theTreasury for reimbursement with interest at the rate of l2%o fromthe date of submission of bills t l the date of payment and also toconsider and dispose of the representation dated 12. I1.2O22 ofthe petitioner.

4. This Court as per order dated 30.12.2022 disposed of W.P.No.46716 of 2022 w,ith the following finding:

'ln view of the submissions made by boththecounsels, this Court is inclined to direct the3.drespondent to consider the representation ofthepetitioner dated 12. lI.2022 in accordance with law, asexpeditiously as possible, preferably, within four (04)weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order".

5. The contention of the petitioner is that having receivedthe copy of the above referred orders the 3d respondent neithergave any acknowledgment to the petitioner nor complied with the said orders. Since, the [requests ][made ][by the ][petitioner ][for]implementation of the [said orders went ][in ][vain, the petitioner ][hled]the present Contempt [Case seeking ][a ][direction ][to the ][3'd]respondent for implementing the [said orders ][forthwith and ][to]punish him for his wilful disobedience [towards ][the ][said ][order']

6. During the course of [proceedings' ][learned ][Assistant]Government Pleader, representing [the ][Government ][Pleader ][for]Services-I, by furnishing [Letter ][No.C/39 ][I12023' ][dated]O1.O5.2023 addressed by the [District ][Employment ][Oflicer,]Employment Exchange, [Ranga Reddy ][District to ][the]Commissioner, Employment [& ][Training, ][Mallepallr', ][Hyderabad,]would submit that out of 8 [bilts, the ][amount ][for ][six ][bills ][has]already been paid to the [petitioner and ][one ][bill ][tor ][Rs'24,92O1-]was sent to Kondapur and replv [is ][awaited ][from ][Medical ][Board]and the remaining onc bill 'A [as ][not ][receivcd ][b,v ][ttreir ][office' ][He]further submitted that [necessary ][timely action ][will ][be ][taken ][and]disposal of bills as is done [will ][be ensured ][in ][compliance ][to ][the]orclers of the office of [Commissioner, Employmcnt ][and ][Training,]Hyderabad. He further [submitted ][that ][dela.v ][in ][passine ][the]subject matter bills has [been caused ][only ][clue ][to ][administrative]

and procedura_l grounds, there is no intention of disobeying the orders of this Court. [{e also submitted that bill dated06.04.2022 for Rs.24,030/ is pending arrd it will also be passedafter causing detailed enquiry in accordance with rules in duecourse. Stating thus, the learned Assistant Government pleaderafter causing detailed enquiry in accordance with rules in duecourse. Stating thus, the learned Assistant Government pleaderseeks to close the present Contempt Case.

7 .

This Court, upon verihcation of the entire material available on record and considering the same as well as the rivalcontentions adduced on both sides, is of the view that the delay incontentions adduced on both sides, is of the view that the delay inpassing the subject matter bills is onry due to the administrativeand procedr:ral aspects and the sarne cannot be termed asand procedr:ral aspects and the sarne cannot be termed asdisobedience to the orders of this court and on account of suchdelay, the respondent herein cannor be punished as prayed for.This Court does not see any reason to consider the prayer of thepetitioner and therefore, inclined to close the contempt case.delay, the respondent herein cannor be punished as prayed for.This Court does not see any reason to consider the prayer of thepetitioner and therefore, inclined to close the contempt case.

e. In the result, the result, result, this Contempt Case is closed withoutContempt Case is closed withoutCase is closed withoutis closed withoutclosed withoutwithoutcosts. Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also standclosed.

In the result, the result, result, this Contempt Case is closed withoutContempt Case is closed withoutCase is closed withoutis closed withoutclosed withoutwithout Sd/. M. RAMANA KRISHNADEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1. One CC to SRt. K RAJYA LAKSHMT Advocate [OpUCl

2. Two CCs to Gp FOR SERVTCES t, High Court for the State of Tetanganatourltourl

3. Two CD Copies

P(\4,.

HIGH COURTDATED: 1810712023

ORDER

CC.No.644 ot 2023AGAINSTWP.NO.46716 0F 2022

CLOSING THE CC

WITHOUT GOSTS

Al"qlr.etrZ,

E [g-l.q)6-]-it{o(v\)2NB [2M]c'3 24))ia . ir''-{o. }'-l