Telangana High Court
WP/36957/2021 of Smt. Kokolu Anusuya Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others on 30 December 2021
THE S ;;irrii.,ifl,.rf :,:..I""^,^ IHURS oe v, rHe 3Xff !T5 mIsiDoEfEEruB ER PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITro NNO : 3695 F20217 Between: i 3lj ;.f,? A :'r" fl1ft :: I?,gB,,T fiii Ag,,T X;:f i dfl ",.?,.X8 H:.: 3 ye a rs, occ AND
HIGH COURT FOR THE SS
THE SS;;irrii.,ifl,.rf :,:..I""^,^
IHURS oe v, rHe
3Xff !T5 mIsiDoEfEEruB [ER]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITroNNO : 36957F2021
Between:i 3lj ;.f,?A:'r" fl1ft :: I?,gB,,T fiii Ag,,T X;:f i dfl ",.?,.X8 H:.: 3 ye a rs,occ
...PETITIONERAND
' r!:,:rtSlidt ]:JSH# rep bv its speciar Secretary, Home Department, ' I?3"?3[T]ssioner of Police, cvberabad commissionerate Gachibowri,
3. The Deputy Commissioner of police, Gachibowli, Hyderabad
4. The Diskict Audit Officer, District Audit Office, Nampaily Hyderabad.The Diskict Audit Officer, District Audit Office, Nampaily Hyderabad.
5. K.Prathap Kumar, s/o K.Venkatesw-arlu, aged about 60 years, occ. SeniorAssistant, o/o the commissioner or poticelbyGi;6;,i'eacnhiuowiiiiv'jeraoaa.Assistant, o/o the commissioner or poticelbyGi;6;,i'eacnhiuowiiiiv'jeraoaa.
..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased toissue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature ofwrit of lVandamus, to declare the action of the respondent authorities in not givingwrit of lVandamus, to declare the action of the respondent authorities in not givingany response to the representation dt. 1811212021 submitted by the petitioner forwithholding the entire monetary benefits pertaining to the 5th respondent whoappears to have opted for Voluntary Retirement only to deprive the petitioner and herlawful right, inspite of Petitioner personal visits, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust andlawful right, inspite of Petitioner personal visits, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust andunconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent authorities to withhold theVRS amount pertaining to the 5th respondent herein.VRS amount pertaining to the 5th respondent herein.
lA NO: ['t ]OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be [pleased ]to direct therespondent authorities to consider and pass orders on the representation dt.1811212021 , pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel [for ][the ][Petitioner: ][SRI ][VEMPATI ][MALLIKARJUN ][SHASTRY]counsel for the [Respondent Nos' ][1 ][to ][4: ][GP ][FOR HOME ][(TG)]Counsel for [the ][ResPondent No' ][5: ][-']The Court made [the ][following: ][ORDER]
HON,BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND IOMAR SHAYILIV.P.No.36957 OF 2021
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the pedtioner seeksperrrrission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to thepetitioner to pursue her remedies in accordance with law.Resen"ing such liberry, the Writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. No cor;ts.
Miscellaneogs petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
SD/.K.ONESIMASS]STANT REGISTRAB,/\v,'SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
l One CC to SRI VEMPATI [MALLIKARJUN SHASTRY Advocate ][[OPUC]]2. Two CCs to [GP FOR HOME, ][High Court ][for the ][State of ][Telangana ][at]Hyderabad. [OUT]3. Two CD CoPies
4. One spare [coPY.]
\ -,\-x'
NPJ5t
HIGH [GOURT]
DATED:30 [t1212021]
ORDER
WP.No.36957 [of ][202'l]
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
\[\>J]\xr'
-iSai{ I{.:)c.l)31 [JAfi ][2022]ri.J4'