Telangana High Court
CRP/53/2016 of C RAMA MURTHY, HYD Vs SHRAVAN BADRUKA, HYD AND ANOTHER on 31 December 2021
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 53 OF 2016 Petition under Article 227 o'f lhe Constitution of India aggrieved by the order dated
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 53 OF 2016
Petition under Article 227 o'f lhe Constitution of India aggrieved by the orderdated 26.10.2014 in R.A.No.173 ol 2014 on the file of the Court of the Addl. ChiefJudge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad.
Between:
C. Rama Murthy, S/o. C. Eshwaraiah, aged 58 [years, ][Occ: ][Business']R/o. 15-9-482, Mehboobgund, Hyderabad.
...REVISION PETITIONERYRESPONDENT
AND
1. Shravan Badruka, S/o. Mukundlal Badruka, [aged ][42 years, Occ: ][Business,]
2. Shyam Badruka, S/o. Mukundlal Badruka, [age.d ][41 years, ][Occ: ][Business,.]Boih residents H.No.8-2-686/9/9 & [10, ][Road.No.12, Banlara ][Hills, Hyderabad.]Boih residents H.No.8-2-686/9/9 & [10, ][Road.No.12, Banlara ][Hills, Hyderabad.]
, ..RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT
cRPMP. NO: 75 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ][that in the ][circumstances ][stated ][in]the affidavit filed therewith, the [High ][court ][may ][be ][pleased ][to ][suspend ][the ][order]passed in RA.No.173 of 2014 dated: 26.10.2015 [passed ]by the [Hon'ble Additional]Chief Judge, City Small Causes [Court, ][Hyderabad.]
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI [DAMODAR MUNDRA]
Counsel for the Respondents: [SRI ][R. ][A. ][ACHUTHANAND]
The Court made the following: ORDER
To,
THE HON'B,E DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHACIVII REVISION PETITION NO.53 OF 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned cc unsel for the petitioner submits that the matterhas been settler. between the parties and, therefore, the CivilRevision Petition may be dismissed,has been settler. between the parties and, therefore, the CivilRevision Petition may be dismissed, Recording -he said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infr uctuous.
There shr ll be no order as to costs. Miscellaneousapplications, if a ry, pending shall stand dismissed.
SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR [RAO]ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER
1. The Additional [Cl rief ][Judge, City Small Causes Court, ][Hyderabad]
2. One CC to Sri Dt modar [Mundra, ][Advocate ][OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri [R. ]A. [Achuthanand, Advocate ][OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies5. One Spare [CoPy]obrd"
t4
HIGH [COURT]
DATED: 31l12li'021
ORDERCRP.No.53 of 2016
DISMISSING TlIE CRPAS INFRUCTUOUSAS INFRUCTUOUS
$E [Sia].t-)o()0 [7 ][trl ][2fl22]
I