Telangana High Court
WP/8317/2005 of S.K. Pasha, Vs The District Collector (Panchayat), on 24 December 2008
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 8317 of 2005 Between: S.K. Pasha, S/o. Abdul Gafoor, R/o. Yerravaram Village, Kodada
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENTTHE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINIWRIT PETITION NO : 8317 of 2005
Between:
S.K. Pasha, S/o. Abdul Gafoor,
R/o. Yerravaram Village, Kodada Mandal, Nalgonda District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The District Collector (Panchayat), Nalgonda District at Nalgonda.
2 The District Panchayat officer, Nalgonda District at Nalgonda.
3 The Sarpanch, Yarravaram Gram Panchayat, Yarravaram KodadMandal, Nalgonda District.Mandal, Nalgonda District.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more in the natureof Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not initiating any action against the 3rd Respondent in spite of finding thatthe 3rd respondent has misappropriated the public funds as waspublished in Vartha Telugu Daily dated 6-9-04 even after representing toinitiate action against the 3rd respondent, illegal, arbitrary, and against toall cannons of justice and law, consequently direct the respondents 1 and2 to initiate action against the 3rd respondent herein pursuant to therepresentation of the petitioner forthwith, and pass such other order ororders or as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the caseand in the interests of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner : MR. V.BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY
Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURALDEV.
The Court made the following :
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
WRIT PETITION NO.8317 OF 2005
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission towithdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded.Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Nocosts.
_____________
G.ROHINI, J.
Dt. 24.12.2008 gbs