Telangana High Court

WP/44620/2017 of Gollapalli Mangaiah Vs The Municipal Council, Sattenapally Municipality on 28 December 2017

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO +W.P.NO.44620 of 2017 %Date: 28-12-2017 #Between: Gollapalli Mangaiah S/o. G. Danamma, Occ: Un-employee, R/o.

* I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

* HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND

* HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. GANGA RAO

+ W.P.NO.44620 of 2017

--% Date: 28122017

Betw een:

Gollapalli Mangaiah S/o. G. Danamma, Occ: Un-employee, R/o. H.No.19-1-72, Near Municipal Office, Sattenapalle, Guntur District, A.P.

….. Petitioner

And

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The Municipal Council, Sattenapally Municipality, rep. by its Commissioner, Satennapally, Guntur District – 522 404. Commissioner, Satennapally, Guntur District – 522 404.

2. The District Collector, Guntur District, 500 001, A.P. 3.The Director of Municipal Administration, Government of A.P. Guntur, A.P. 3.The Director of Municipal Administration, Government of A.P. Guntur, A.P.

4. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Municipal Administration & Urban Development, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi Capital City, Guntur District, A.P. to Municipal Administration & Urban Development, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi Capital City, Guntur District, A.P.

…. Respondents

! Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. M. Pitchaiah ^ Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Mr. N. Satyanarayana ^ Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : G.P. for Municipality < GI ST:

> HEAD NOTE:

? Cases referred

HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. GANGA RAO

WRI T PETI TI ON No.44620 of 2017

ORDER:(Per VRS,J)

Aggrieved by the dismissal of his Original Application for non-prosecution and the subsequent dismissal of his application for restoration, the petitioner has come up with the above writ petition.

2. Heard Mr. M. Pitchaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N. Satyanarayana, learned counsel takes notice for the 1[st] respondent-Municipality.

3. The petitioner filed an Original Application in O.A.No.4951 of 2014 on the file of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, challenging the refusal of the respondents to appoint him on compassionate grounds. The application was dismissed for non-prosecution on 24.03.2017.

4. The petitioner filed an application for restoration. But the application for restoration was also dismissed on 27.10.2017, on the ground that the counsel for the writ petitioner maintained consistency in being absent. The Tribunal was not satisfied with the explanation offered by the petitioner for counsel’s non-appearance. Therefore, the petitioner is before us.

5. The claim of the petitioner in his Original Application was for compassionate appointment on the ground that his mother was retired on medical invalidation and that therefore, he is entitled for appointment on compassionate grounds. The petitioner is an unemployed person. Therefore, the cases of this nature require a sympathetic approach only insofar as restoration and hearing on merits. It may be a different issue when the matter is decided on merits.

6. Therefore, the writ petition is allowed. The impugned orders are set aside and the application for restoration is allowed. The Tribunal may deal with the Original Application on its own merits.

7. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending in this writ petition, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

______________________

V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN, J.

28[th] December, 2017 Js.

_______________ M. GANGA RAO, J.

Js.

HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND

HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. GANGA RAO

WRI T PETI TI ON No.44620 of 2017

28[th] December, 2017

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead