Telangana High Court
CRLP/15248/2013 of Kochuruvu Raja Gopal Vs The State of AP., on 30 December 2013
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRL.P. NO:15248 of 2013 Between: 1 Kochuruvu Raja Gopal S/o Laxminarayana ( A -2) 2 Kochuruvu Lalitha W/o Rajagopal ( A -3) 3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABADMONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAOCRL.P. NO:15248 of 2013
Between:
1 Kochuruvu Raja Gopal S/o Laxminarayana (A-2)
2 Kochuruvu Lalitha W/o Rajagopal (A-3)
3 Rajakanti Swapna W/o Raju (A-4)
4 Rajakanti Raju S/o Gopal (A-5)
5 R.Sangeetha W/o Aravind (A-6)
6 Kocheruvu Shirish S/o Rajagopal (A-7)
..... Petitioners/Accused No. 2 to 7
AND
The State of AP., Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP., Hyderabad
.....Respondent/Complainant
Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that inthe circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioners / A2 to A7on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.122/2013 of PS.,Achampet PS., Mahabubnagar District.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing thepetition and the grounds filed herein and upon hearing the argumentsof Sri P.Vamsheedhar Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and of theAddl. Public Prosecutor for the Respondent. the Court made thefollowing.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
“Heard the learned counsel appearing for thepetitioners/A-2 to A-7 and the learned Additional PublicProsecutor representing the State.
This criminal petition is filed under Section 438 of theCode of Criminal Procedure seeking anticipatory bail to thepetitioners.
The petitioners are the close relatives of the first accusedwho is the husband of the de facto complainant. Only certainvague and general allegations have been made against thepetitioners. It seems that they were implicated in the instant case they being the close relatives. Hence, I am of the view that thepetitioners can be granted anticipatory bail.
The petitioners/A-2 to A-7 are directed to surrender beforethe Station House Officer, Police Station, Achampet,Mahboobnagar District within (20) days from the date of thisorder and thereafter, they shall be released on bail on theirexecuting personal bonds in a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees tenthousand only) each with two sureties for a like sum each to thesatisfaction of the said S.H.O.
The criminal petition is allowed accordingly.”
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Achampet,Mahabubnagar DistrictMahabubnagar District
2. The Station House Officer, Achampet Police Station,MahabubnagarMahabubnagar
3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad(OUT)(OUT)
4. one CC to Sri P.Vamsheedhar Reddy, Advocate (OPUC)
5. One Spare Copy
ABDRAFTED ON 30-12-2013
HIGH COURT
RKRJ
DATE: 30-12-2013
ORDER
CRL.P. NO. 15248 OF 2013