Telangana High Court
CRP/5631/2015 of SRI OM PRAKASH, HYD Vs SMT. K. SANDHYA RANI, SECUNDERABAD on 31 December 2021
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA Between: SRI OM PRAKASH, HYD, S/o. Late Pochaiah, Agred 48 years, Occ: Employee in NABARD, situated at RTC X Roads, Hyderabad, R/o.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5631 OF 2015
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated28th Octorber, 2015 in l.A.No. 337 of 2015 in FCOP.No. 215 of 2O14 on the file of theJudge, Family Court at Secunderabad.
Between:
SRI OM PRAKASH, HYD, S/o. Late Pochaiah, Agred 48 [years, ]Occ: Employee [in]NABARD, situated at RTC X Roads, Hyderabad, R/o. Plot.No. 37 [Road.No. ][7,]Sri Krishna Nilayam, Alakapuri Colony, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERiRESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
AND
SMT. K. SANDHYA RANI, SECUNDERABAD, W/o. S;i. K. Om Prakash, [Aged about ][42]years, Occ: Household, R/o. H.NO. 6-3-179110124,IDH Colony, New Bhoiguda,Secunderabad-80
,,.RESPONDENTS/PETITION ERYPETITIONER,
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(CRPMP. NO: 7395 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court may be [pleased ]disclosed [in]the accompanying affidavit, this Honourable Court may be [pleased ]suspend the orderdated 28th October, 2015 in l.A.No. 337 of 2015 in FCOP.No. 215 ol 2014 on the fileof the Judge, Family Court at Secunderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI T. S. PRAVEEN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent : [-none-]The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HOI'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P. SREE [SUDTIA]
CML R ,VISION PETITION No.5631 of [2O15]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This C.R.'. is filed questioning the order [passed]
1n
I.A.No.337 of 20 15 in F.C.O.P.No.215 of [2O14 ][dated]28.10.2015 on the file of Jude, [Family ]Court, [Secunderabad.]
As per th ) case status information, [F.C.O.P.No.215 of]20 14 itself was lisposed of on 24.3.2O16.
Therefore this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed [as]infructuous. N r order as to costs. Miscellaneor-ts [petitions]pending, if any shall stand closed SD/.T.SRINIVASIASSISTANT REGISTRAR(_ U,,SECTION OFFICERASSISTANT REGISTRAR(_ U,,SECTION OFFICER
,TRUE COPY//
To,
1. The Judge, Family 3ourt, [Secunderabad.]2. One CC to SRl. [T- ][i,PRAVEEN KUMA$Advocate ][OPUC]3. Two CD Copies.
4. One Spare Copy
PCSDTR
HIGH COURT
DATED:31 11212C21
ORDERCRP.No.5631 o'2015
DISMISSING TI{E [C.R.P.]AS INFRUCTUI)US.
y'
rr [\o\]h
/. ^?5..:,-1.cz$,ltxi [?,]o{