CRLP/11038/2009 of Vangari Vasudev Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 31 December 2009

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDYCRIMINAL PETITION No.11038 OF 2009ORDER:

This Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by thepetitioner – accused seeking to quash the proceedings in CrimeNo.398 of 2009 of Siricilla Police Station, Karimnagar District,registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 413, 504and 506 IPC.

2. Heard both sides.

3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner isthat the present petitioner has filed a complaint against the husband ofthe de facto complainant on 17.12.2009, which was referred to police,on the basis of which police registered a case on 21.12.2009, thepresent complaint is given on 21.12.2009 making false averments.

4. A copy of the complaint filed against the husband of the defacto complainant is filed showing that the present petitioner has givensuch a complaint. Thus, there is prima facie material to believe that afalse complaint is given as a counterblast.

5. In the circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner shall notbe arrested till filing of charge sheet, if any. The investigation andconsequential steps on the basis of result of investigation shall go on.

31[st] December 2009Note:Issue copy of the orderwithin three days. B/o. Rns ___________________

P. SWAROOP REDDY, J.

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDYCRIMINAL PETITION No.10561 OF 2009ORDER:

This Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed seekingto modify the orders dated 27.11.2009 passed by the I AdditionalMetropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in Crl.M.P.No.1011 of 2009in C.C.No.6 of 2002 and permit the petitioner – accused No.88 to leavethe country for a period of eight months from the last week of January,2010 to last week of September, 2010 for pilgrimage on foot byreducing the condition of security deposit of Rs.1,00,000/-.

3. Heard both sides.

4. The petitioner wants to go for pilgrimage by foot. As such,time granted by the Court below till February 2010 may not be sufficient. Hence, the time granted vide orders dated 27.11.2009 bythe learned I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad isextended till the end of September 2010. Other conditions imposed bythe learned Sessions Judge, shall remain unaltered.

5. The Criminal Petition is accordingly allowed.

16[th] December 2009Rns

___________________

P. SWAROOP REDDY, J.