Telangana High Court
WP/23350/2009 of K.Balaraju Vs The Deputy Registrar/Regional Manager, on 29 December 2009
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.23350 OF 2009 Between: K. Balaraju, S/o. Sanjeevaiah ..... PETITIONER AND The Deputy
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.23350 OF 2009
Between:
K. Balaraju, S/o. Sanjeevaiah
..... PETITIONER
AND
The Deputy Registrar/Regional Manager,Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Housing Societies Federation LimitedKadapa and another
....RESPONDENTS
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.23350 OF 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Court ordered notice before admission on 30.10.2009 andgranted interim stay on condition of deposit of half of the amount duewithin a period of four weeks.
2. It is stated that the interim order had not been complied with.
3. This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus declaring thenotice issued by respondent No.1 in E.P.No.129/04-05, dated22.09.2009 proposing to conduct auction of the residential house on29.10.2009 or on any other future date without consideringrepresentation of the petitioner, dated 25.08.2009 as illegal, arbitraryand violative of principles of natural justice and consequently to setaside the same and further direct the respondents to consider therepresentation of the petitioner, dated 25.08.2009 for grant of six monthstime and pass such other suitable orders.
4. Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe writ petition.
5. It is stated that the petitioner is entitled to make a representationpraying for one time settlement. Liberty is given to the petitioner tomake such representation in accordance with law. Except making thisobservation nothing further can be done at this stage.
6. Subject to the above observation, Writ Petition is dismissed atthe stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs.
December 29, 2009MD
___________________
P.S. NARAYANA, J