Gujarat High Court
SCR.A/749/2000 of KANTIBHAI CHHAGANBHAI TADVI Vs TADVI URMILABEN D/O OF DAMANBHAI on 4 December 2000
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 749 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No 749 of 2000
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- KANTIBHAI CHHAGANBHAI TADVIVersus TADVI URMILABEN D/O OF DAMANBHAI -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MS SADHANA SAGAR for Petitioner MR SAMIR DAVE APP for Respondent - State
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.K.KESHOTE
Date of decision: 04/12/2000
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Rule. Mr.Samir Dave waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent-State. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the provisions of Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code. In case the amount of maintenance as awarded to the wife by the Judicial Magistrte, First Clss, under section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code is not paid, the husband can be sent behind the bars but this imprisonment cannot be for a period exceeding one month. Here, it is exceeding one month and as such, indulgence of this court is called for in the matter. The petitioner is to be set free forthwith by the jail authority. Rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs.
.......
(sunil)