Telangana High Court
WP/15597/2005 of Dr. K. Ayodhya Ramaiah, Vs The Vijayawada Municipal Corporation, on 30 December 2014
SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.15597 of 2005 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for first respondent. 2. This Writ Petition was filed challenging the notice dated 30.06.2005 issued by the first respondent in respect of the
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAOWRIT PETITION No.15597 of 2005
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned StandingCounsel for first respondent.
2. This Writ Petition was filed challenging the notice dated 30.06.2005issued by the first respondent in respect of the premises bearing No.29-8-41/1, situated at Chiluku Durgaiah Street, Suryaraopet, Vijayawada.
3. The first respondent issued the impugned proceedings on30.06.2005 stating that the petitioner took plan for construction ofresidential house and subsequently converted into a mental hospital. Since no set backs were maintained, a neighbour filed a complaint and inpursuance of the said complaint, the first respondent inspected thebuilding on 31.05.2005 and directed the petitioner to remove the deviatedportion of the building.
4. This Court, by order dated 18.07.2005, directed the firstrespondent not to demolish the structures.
5. Now the learned Standing Counsel for the first respondentsubmitted a copy of the proceedings issued by the first respondent,dated 10.10.2014, considering the application of the petitioner dated30.03.2008 for penalisation and regularisation of unauthorisedstructures. In view of the said proceedings, the challenge to the orderdated 30.06.2005 does not survive for consideration.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. MiscellaneousPetitions pending, if any in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
______________________________
A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J