Telangana High Court
WP/23306/2006 of Banoth Chavali Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Prl. on 29 December 2006
SRI JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO W.P. No. 23306 of 2006 Dated: 29.12.2006 Banoth Chavali and another. ..Petitioners Vs The Government of A.P. represented by its Principal Secretary for Home, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad and others. ..Respondents.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO
W.P. No. 23306 of 2006
Dated: 29.12.2006
Banoth Chavali and another.
Vs
..Petitioners
The Government of A.P. represented by itsPrincipal Secretary for Home, SecretariatBuilding, Hyderabad and others.
..Respondents.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO
W.P. No. 23306 of 2006
O R DE R(per the Hon’ble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao)
The petitioners 1 and 2 are the mother and brother of BanothPadmavathi respectively. They filed this Writ of Habeas Corpus forproduction of Banoth Padmavathi.
2) It is averred in the petition that the detenu Padmavathi wasstudying Degree final year at Khammam. While so on 20.8.2006 at about11.30 p.m. when her daughter along with her son was studying, all of asudden 5[th] respondent along with some others came to their house, tookaway the detenu. They also took away cash of Rs.70,000/-, two goldbangles and one gold chain. On a report, the police registered a case inCrime No.152 of 2006 dated 22.8.2006 under Sections 366 and 380IPC. In spite of their repeated requests, the police are not tracing thedetenu.
3) The 4[th] respondent the Sub Inpector of Police filed counter interalia stating that their investigation revealed that the detenu was in lovewith 5[th] respondent. Both of them were missing and they have beensearching for them.
4) On 27.12.2006 the detenu was produced in this Court. She wasexamined in the chambers of one of us in the presence of the learnedGovernment Pleader and the learned counsel for the petitioners. The detenu stated that she left the house voluntarily and on her own accord,and married the 5[th] respondent. She also represented that she was bornon 10.6.1983, and became a major. She passed degree examination inthe month of March, 2006.
5) In the light of her statement and that too she being a major,nothing survives in this Writ Petition.
6) In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
-----------------------------------
JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
------------------------------JUSTICE D. APPA RAO, 29[th] December 2006.BCS