Telangana High Court
WP/24427/2004 of G. Jayasimha Reddy, Vs The District Collector, on 28 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO.24427 of 2004 Between: G. Jayasimha Reddy, S/o late Ramireddy, R/o M. Chintakunta,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAWRIT PETITION NO.24427 of 2004
Between:
G. Jayasimha Reddy, S/o late Ramireddy,
R/o M. Chintakunta, Ghospad Mandal, Kurnool District.
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The District Collector, Kurnool District, Kurnool.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nandyal, Kurnool District.
3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Ghospad Mandal, Kurnool District.
..... PETITIONER
....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in attempting todispossess the petitioner from the land to an extent of Ac.24.92 cents situated inSy.Nos.30/4, 43/1B, 43/3B, 44/1, 44/3, 97/2, 102/1B, 104/2A, 105/2A, 120/1C,129/1B1, 148/1A, 148/3A, 150/1C2, 150/2, 181/1 of M. Chintakunta, GhospadMandal, Kurnool District, without having any manner of right or authority as illegal,arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to interferewith the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the above lands.
Counsel for the Petitioner: K.ARUNA
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court, at the admission stage, made the following:
ORDER:Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writpetition. Permission is accorded.Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.________________(N.V. RAMANA, J)Date: 28.12.2004Nsr..... REGISTRAR// TRUE COPY //SECTION OFFICERTo
1. The District Collector, Kurnool District, Kurnool.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nandyal, Kurnool District.
3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Ghospad Mandal, Kurnool District.
4. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad(OUT)
5. Two CD copies.