Telangana High Court
WP/27503/2007 of P.Sushil kumar Vs The District Collector, Chittoor District, Chittoor on 26 December 2007
SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO.27503 OF 2007 Date: 26.12.2007. Between: P.Sushil Kumar, S/o.P.Prabakaran, …Petitioner. and The District Collector, Chittoor District And two others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION NO.27503 OF
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION NO.27503 OF 2007
Date: 26.12.2007.
Between:P.Sushil Kumar, S/o.P.Prabakaran, …Petitioner.
and
The District Collector, Chittoor District And two others.
…Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION NO.27503 OF 2007
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
It is the case of the petitioner that he is the ownerand possessor of the agricultural lands of extent of Acs.2.77cents, Ac.0.21 cents and 0.06 cents in Survey Nos.9/2B, 9/2D and8 respectively, situated at Rallakuppam village, SatyaveduMandal, Chittoor district. The said lands are said to have beenpurchased by the father of the petitioner under registered saledeed, dated 02.09.1992.
It is stated that the name of the petitioner was alsoentered into the revenue records and the pattadar pass book, titledeeds were issued in the year 2002. While so, theTahasildar/Mandal Revenue Officer, Satyavedu Mandal made anattempt to interfere with the said lands, asking the workers of thepetitioner to remove material from the said lands.
It is the case of the petitioner that without issuingany notice and without following due process of law, the petitioneris sought to be dispossessed.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances andwithout expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of thecase as to whether the said land is assigned land or theGovernment land, even if the petitioner is encroacher or that thesaid lands are assigned lands, without following the due process of law, the petitioner shall not be dispossessed.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed ofdirecting respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to dispossess the petitionerfrom the above said lands without following the due process oflaw.
Date:26.12.2007. GS
___________________
V.ESWARAIAH, J.