Telangana High Court
WP/21203/2005 of M/s. Sri Venkateswara Builders, Vs The Addl. Commissioner (CT), on 26 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No. 21203 OF 2005 28-12-2005 Between: M/s.Sri Venkateswara Builders, Moosapet, Rangareddy District, rep. by its Managing Partner. ………Petitioner And The Addl.Commissioner (CT), Andhra
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
WRIT PETITION No. 21203 OF 2005
28-12-2005
Between:
M/s.Sri Venkateswara Builders, Moosapet, Rangareddy District, rep.by its Managing Partner.
………Petitioner
And
The Addl.Commissioner (CT), Andhra Pradesh, Commercial TaxesComplex, Hyderabad & Others.
……..Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
WRIT PETITION No. 21203 OF 2005
ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, J)
Heard learned Counsel for the parties. With their consent, theWrit Petition is being disposed of at this stage.
The controversy is that pending an appeal, application for staywas dismissed by the competent authority. We have gone throughthe record. We feel that the interest of justice would have been met ifstay was granted pending appeal, subject to deposit of half of theliability. Therefore, we set aside the order of the authority and directthat half of the disputed tax liability shall be paid by the petitionerwithin a period of four weeks. For four weeks, there shall be anunconditional stay and the stay shall continue till disposal of theappeal, provided the amount is deposited within four weeks. Thedeposit of amount shall be without prejudice to the rights of thepetitioner in the appeal.
The petitioner further submits that he cannot pay half of theliability as ordered by this Court, as the Bank Accounts have beenattached. The attachment of the Bank Accounts shall remain stayed.Before the attachment is stayed, the petitioner shall file anundertaking in this Court that immediately after removal ofattachment, he will deposit half of the liability. On furnishing suchundertaking before the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court, theattachment shall remain stayed.
Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs.
28[th] December 2005
________________(BILAL NAZKI, J)
N.B:-
________________(C.V. RAMULU, J)
(B/o)ajr