Telangana High Court
WP/27871/2005 of Vissamsetti Parasuramudu Vs The Additional Agent to the Government on 29 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.27871 of 2005 Date:29.12.2005 Between: Vissamsetti Parasuramudu -------PETITIONER AND The Government of State of A.P. and others ---------RESPONDENTS ORDER: The petitioner filed an appeal before the Additional Agent to the Government, East Godavari
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
W.P.No.27871 of 2005
Date:29.12.2005
Between:
Vissamsetti Parasuramudu
-------PETITIONER
AND
The Government of State of A.P. and others
---------RESPONDENTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner filed an appeal before the Additional Agent to the Government, EastGodavari District at Rampachodavaram, the first respondent herein, against theorder, dated 24.08.2005, passed by the Special Deputy Collector (Tribunal Welfare),Rampachodavaram, the second respondent herein, in L.T.R.P.No.306 of 2004. Thepetitioner states that he filed an application for stay and complains that no ordershave been passed by the first respondent so far.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader forSocial Welfare.
It is not known as to whether the petitioner presented the appeal within the period oflimitation, or whether the application for stay has been pursued with the neededvigour.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined togrant any positive or specific orders except that the first respondent be directed todispose of the application for stay, within a period of four weeks.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders in the application filed by the petitioner for interim orders,within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereshall be no order as to costs.
________________
29.12.2005
kdl