Telangana High Court
WP/14694/2008 of Sri K.V.V.Srinivas, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, on 29 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION No.14694 of 2008 Dated: 21.09.2010 Between: K.V.V.Srinivas. .. Petitioner. And The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others. .. Respondents. ORDER: Petitioner filed this
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
WRIT PETITION No.14694 of 2008
Dated: 21.09.2010
Between:
K.V.V.Srinivas. .. Petitioner.
And
The Government of Andhra PradeshRep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others. .. Respondents.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Petitioner filed this writ petition seeking the following substantive relief:
“..Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriatewrit, order or direction more particularly one in the natureof Writ of Mandamus holding that the inaction on the partof the respondents 1 and 2 in not taking immediate andappropriate action on the report dated 20.4.2006submitted by the 2[nd] respondent to the 1[st] respondentwhereunder the 2[nd] respondent requested the 1[st]respondent to book a case against the respondents 3 to6 as well as respondent No.7, for the offence underSections 406, 409, 420, 120-A and 120-B of I.P.C. andalso take departmental action against the respondents 3
to 6, and also the 12[th] respondent in not takingimmediate and appropriate action in the F.I.R.No.135/06,to cause immediate investigation, arrest the accusedsend them for remand ascertain the actual amount of themisappropriation done, as illegal, arbitrary, void andunconstitutional as well as undemocratic, and direct therespondents 1 and 2 as well as respondent No.12 to takeimmediate and appropriate action to proceed criminally,as well as, departmentally against respondents 3 to 7, as7[th] respondent as she has deliberately for ulterior motive,and benefit and illegally passed surcharge order inR.C.No.685/2006.B dated 15.10.2007 which amounts tocriminal offence and pass such other order or orders asdeemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
The grievance of the petitioner is that based on the writtencomplaint submitted by him on 29.06.2006 against respondents 3 to 6for misappropriation of funds of A.P. Special Protection ForceEmployees Co-Op. Credit Society Limited, except registering a case inCrime No.135 of 2006 of Nampally Police Station, Hyderabad, by the12[th] respondent - Sub-Inspector of Police, Nampally Police Station, noinvestigation has been taken up till date.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressingany opinion on merits, the 12[th] respondent is directed to expedite theinvestigation in Crime No.135 of 2006 of P.S. Nampally and takeappropriate action within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as tocosts.
21.09.2010v v
_____________
C.V.RAMULU,J