CA/1/2021 of S. Sreenu Vs E.J. David on 31 December 2021

1. E.J. David S/o. Late E.J.John, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o.H.No.'1-2-49lG1, Christian Colony Mahboobnagar District, Telangana State.H.No.'1-2-49lG1, Christian Colony Mahboobnagar District, Telangana State.

2. K. Saraswathi, Tahasildar/Mandal Revenue Officer, Kandi Mandal (PreviouslySangareddy Mandal) Sangareddy District, Telangana State.Sangareddy Mandal) Sangareddy District, Telangana State.

3. S. Sreenu, Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy Division, SangareddyDistrict, Telangana State,District, Telangana State,

4. Ramadevi, Tahsilda ri lt4a nda I Revenue Officer, Kandi l\rlandal, (PreviouslySangareddy lt/andal) Sangareddy District, Telangana State. (Present II,/RO)Sangareddy lt/andal) Sangareddy District, Telangana State. (Present II,/RO)

(Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are not necessary parties in this contempt appeal)

.,.RESPONDENTS

Counsel for the Appellant: SRI D. JAGAN MOHAN REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI K. S. MURTHY

coNTEMPT APPEAL NO: 1 OF 2021

Contempt Appeal Under Section 19 of Contempt of Courts [Act ][against ][the]order dated '15-12-2020 in C.C. No. 1681 of 2019 on the [file ][of ][the ][High ][Court]

Between:

S. Sreenu, S/o. Thavurya, Aged about 42years, [Occ.Revenue Divisional Officer]Distiict. ---APPELLANT /R/o. Yellareddy Divisioh Kamareddy PETITIONER / RESPONDENT NO. 2

AND

1. E.J. David, S/o. Late E.J.John Aged [about ][60 ][years, Occ. Business ][R/o]H.No.1 -2-49lG1, Christian Colony lr/ahboobnagar [District, Telangana]State.H.No.1 -2-49lG1, Christian Colony lr/ahboobnagar [District, Telangana]State.

2. K. Saraswath Tahasildar/Mandal Revenue Officer KandiMandal,(Prev :usly Sangareddy Mandal) Sangareddy l)istrict, TelanganaState.Mandal,(Prev :usly Sangareddy Mandal) Sangareddy l)istrict, TelanganaState.

3. Ramadevi, Te rsildar/Mandal Revenue Officer, Kandi lltanrjal,(previouslyS.angareddy I landal) Sangareddy District, Telangana {itatu.. (presentMRO)S.angareddy I landal) Sangareddy District, Telangana {itatu.. (presentMRO)

4. Lakshma Red iy, Joint Sub-Registrar- l, Sanga Reddy District TelanganaState.State.

(Respondent Nol . 2 to 4 are not necessary parties in this oontempt appeal)

..,ItESPONDENTS

Counsel for the App ,llant: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL

Counsel for the Resl [,ondent ]No.1 : SRI K. S. MURTHY

CONTEMPT APPEAL NO: 2 OF 2021

Contempt Ap6 eal Under Section 19 of Contempt of Courts ,Act against theorder dated 15-12-2 )20 in C.C. No. 1681 of 2019 on the file c,f the High Court Between:

Smt. U. Ramade' i, W/o. M. Madhava Rao, Aged 4g years Occ. GovernmentService. Presently vorking as Tahsildar, KondapuiMandal Sar gareddy District

... Appellant / Petitioner / Respondent No. 3

AND

1. E.J. 1-2-491G1 David, , S/o Chr stran Late E.J.John Colony I\/ahboobnagar Aged about 60 years, Occ. Business R/o District, Telanggana State, H.No.

2. K. Saraswathi, [-ahasildar/lt/a ]ndal Revenue Offtcer Kandi Mandral,(previouslySangareddy lr,4; ndal) Sangareddy District, Telangana State.Sangareddy lr,4; ndal) Sangareddy District, Telangana State.

3. S. Sreenu, Rev rnue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy Division/ SangareddyDistrict, Telangi na StateDistrict, Telangi na State

4. Ljrkshma Redd , Joint Sub-Registrar - l, Sanga Reddy District Telangana State.(Respondent N, s. 2 to 4 are not necessary parties in ihis ccntempt a-ppeal)(Respondent N, s. 2 to 4 are not necessary parties in ihis ccntempt a-ppeal)

...RESPONDENTS

Counsel for the Appe llant: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL

Counsel for the Resp rndent No.1 : SRI K. S. MURTHY

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISI{ CHANDRA SHARMAANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N

CONTEMPf APPEAL Nos.21 of2O20. 1 and 2 of2021

COMMON JUDGMENTT eer dE tron,bte theCl,e/J,srrc€ sa!6h chan ctra sha.mo)

The appellants are present in Court. At the outset, theappellants have tendered an unconditional apologz for anyact or omission made inadvertently in good faith which mayamount to disobedience of the order passed by this Court.act or omission made inadvertently in good faith which mayamount to disobedience of the order passed by this Court.They have also stated that they have got high regards for theorders passed by this Court and they have always made allpossibie endeavours to implement the orders passed by thisCourt liom time to time.orders passed by this Court and they have always made allpossibie endeavours to implement the orders passed by thisCourt liom time to time.

It has been informed that the order passed by thisCourt has been complied with.

In the considered opinion of this Court, though there isa delay in complying with the order passed by this Court,however, the fact is that the orcter passed by this Court hasbeen complied with and therefore, the present ContemptAppeals stand disposed of and the sentence imposed on theappellants by the leal'ned Single Judge is hereby set aside.There shall be no order as to costs.

":[,'-THEt?$[tR//rRUE coPY/ t Ci)

SECTION OFFICER

To,1.Sri.Veera Reddy, S/o. _Venkat Narayan Reddy, aged about 52 years, AdditionalCollector, Sangareddy Division Sangareddy Districl, Tetangana State.Collector, Sangareddy Division Sangareddy Districl, Tetangana State.

2. K, Saraswathi, Tahasildar/Mandal Revenu6 Officer, Kandil/andal (prevlouslySangareddy lt/andal) Sangareddy District, Telangana State.Sangareddy lt/andal) Sangareddy District, Telangana State.3.S. Sreenu, Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy Division, SangareddyDistrict, Telangana State.

4- Ramadevi, Tahsi, [jar/Mandal ]Revenue [Officer, Kandi Mandal, ][(Pn:viously-]Sangaredily Man ial) Sangareddy [District, ][Telangana State. (Present ][MRO)]Sangaredily Man ial) Sangareddy [District, ][Telangana State. (Present ][MRO)]5. Two- CCS io Tht Advocate [General ], [High ][Court for the State ][of ][Telangana ][at]Hyderabad.Hyderabad.

6. Oire CC to SRl. [l' ].S, MURTHYAdvocate IOPUCI

7. One CC to Sri D. Jagan Mohan [Reddy, ][Advocate (OPUC)]

8. Two CD Copies

9. One Spare Copy

k

KUL

HIGH COURT

DATED:31 11212021

Common Orde'Contempt Appeal I i os . 21 OF 2020 . I AND 2 0b- 202r DISPOSTNC OF THE CC \TEMPT APPEALS.

*Y/ / \ot^\r,\0

r,1t\E [l-.i ][l"A ];('Y:I\-.o1 8 JAH [2022 ]i7.I