Telangana High Court
CC/1195/2003 of M/s. The Water users Association Vs Sri Jayesh Ranjan on 15 December 2003
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THREE : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: L. NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1195 of 2003 (Contempt Case U/s 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent Nos. 5 to 7
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABADMONDAY THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND THREE: PRESENT:THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: L. NARASIMHA REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE No.1195 of 2003
(Contempt Case U/s 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent Nos. 5 to 7 forContempt of Court for violation of the Final Order dated: 06-02-2002 in W.P. No. 20323 of 2000 passed by thisHon`ble Court )
Between:
M/s. The Water Users Association Thimmaya Gari Pale, Cheruvu (Tank)Rep. by its President Sri Gadikota Bapanaiah Petitioner
And
1. The Govt. of A.P. rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Revenue Department, Sectt.,Hyderabad
2. The Chief Commissioner of Land Admn.,Govt.of A.P.,Nampally, Hyderabad
3. The Secretary, Irrigation Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad.
4. The Secretary, Panchayt Raj Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad.
5. Sri Jayesh Ranjan, The District Collector, Cuddapah Dist.
6. Sri G. Venkateswarlu,. The Revenue Divl. Officer, Rajampet, Cuddapah Dist.
7. M Eswaraiah, The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chitvel Mandal, Cuddapah Dist.
(Respondent Nos.1, 2, 3, 4 is not necessary parties this petition)
Respondents
The Case coming on for hearing upon perusing the case and the affidavit filed herein and the order of theHigh Court dated: 24-11-2003 and made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. K. Sankaraiah, Advocate forthe petitioner, and of the G.P. for Revenue, for the respondents 5 to 7, the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
“The District Collector, 5[th] respondent herein has filed counter affidavit and enclosed copies of variousproceedings and correspondence.A perusal of the same indicates that the directions issued by this Court in the matter of assignment orallotment of tank-bed land are flouted. The 1[st] respondent is therefore directed to appear before this Courton 08-12-2003.
The 7[th] respondent is present before this Court. A reading of the counter affidavit filed by the 5[th]respondent discloses that the decision taken by himself and the 7[th] respondent has nothing to do with thematter. Hence her presence is dispensed with.
Post on 08-12-2003”.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
// true copy//
SECTION OFFICER
To
1. The Prl. Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. of A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad (BY SPECIAL MESSENGERwith a copy of petition and affidavit with a direction to appear before this Court on 08-12-2003 at 10.30. a.m)
2. Sri Jayesh Ranjan, The District Collector, Cuddapah Dist.
3. Sri G. Venkateswarlu,. The Revenue Divl. Officer, Rajampet, Cuddapah Dist.
4. M Eswaraiah, The Mandal Revenue Officer, Chitvel Mandal, Cuddapah Dist.
5. Two CCs to the G.P. for Revenue, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (BY SPECIAL MESSENGER with a copy ofpetition and affidavit)petition and affidavit)
6. One spare copy. (2 to 4 BY RPAD with a copy of petition and affidavit)
Ksv
KsvDate of drafting: 02-12-2003
HIGH COURT
NOTE: POST ON 08-12-2003
ORDER
C.C. No. 1195 of 2003
DIRECTION TO THEFIRST RESPONDENTTO BE PRESENT BEFORETHIS COURT ON 08-12-2003 AT 10.30.
A.M