CC/2120/2023 of L. V. Subrahmanyam Vs Sri Maruthi Rao on 29 December 2023

ORDER:

Alleging violation of the order dated 72.07.2023 passed by thisCourt in Writ Petition No.18053 of 2023, the present Contempt Case isfiled.

2.

2. Learned standing counsel appearing for respondents submitsthat in pursuance to the order dated 12.02.2023, the respondentauthorities issued proceed ing No.317l TIT. / C3 / LNZ / GHMC / 2023dated 28.1,0.20?i and further drawn attention of this Court to thefollowing paragraph:- "ln compliancc uith the abooe ord.er, a heaing was cond.ucted withbgth the parties on 11-8-2023 in the Chambers of DeputyCommissioner, Circle No.3, Hayath Nagar and both iW pirtii,hlye- lltlnded the teanng. Dunng the heaing the peiitionerS^n.L V.Submhflunyam has reiterated that his neighbourSmt.K.Anitha Red.dy is making construction without baoiig eaen2 feet distance to his compound uall and requested to remooe thedeztiations. Thz unofrcial Respondent Smt..K.Anitha Reddy hasstatcd that she has obtained building permission uide permitNo. 30 3252/6 377/G H MC202 3 D t :22-06-2023 for construction ofStilt [+ ]2 upper floors at Plot No.284, H.No.3-7-62,e.g4, situated atSouthend Park, Mansoorabad and left 3,.6, setback towardscomplainant's side ns per sanctioned plan but since the petitionerSd.L.V.Subrahmanyam has encroachcd 1'.6,, into her land (i.e., 13S-q y!t) the sptback on ground is tooking as 2 feet Only. She hasfarther [stated ][tlut ][she ][has ]fled ciuil suit in O.S No.555 of 2023

w

(

before the Hon,ble prirsi. \Li!,y,v,r L. v. s u braimr [i;:::,::,1:"*',;';o"'ilf:;,f:o"':::,[::]a 8a 8a t n s n s s try, n, irii, g si. \Li!,y,v,r L. v. s u braimr [i;:::,::,1:"*',;';o"'ilf:;,f:o"':::,[::]a 8a 8a t n s n s s try, n, irii, g [[r;;; ]][[,i';, ][;;;::;r.. ]][[;;;::;r.. ]]

a 8a 8a t n s n s s t" [[r;;; ]]"f [[,i';, ][;;;::;r.. ]][[;;;::;r.. ]]

" "f It is subnitted Smt..Kosala Anitha also submitted complainlsubmitted complainlIt is subnitted Smt..Kosala Anitha also submitted complainlsubmitted complainl also submitted complainlsubmitted complainldated:3l-07-2023 asainst. Sri.L.V.Subrah*rifio*' ona ako p::dr!^g Wp,Note.sT! adjutlication, pursuant o1 iozs * ,ni, to uoriiir"*'rii"r"o complaint of Smt.Kosala the sanrc Anithaftedisda 1-8-2023 te d: 3t -07 -202 in 3, this rt :_ !r: t rrii" r'n"r1_ir** ron o ao tra,r,.Ni.stztwtuuqcin_iaiCifuclzozs Sri.L.V.Subrahnanvam and hc has ,iri i"i*rirri explanation tototlrc said show-Caui notice on 07_0g_2023.

The documents and statcme-nts haae been aerifed and. obseroe.d thii furnished eaiii ,ni! by both the parties"li* has already:;'#::,::n::r!! ff";i.rrt:i"t [a"'i' ][to-'ozllis ][tv o,ui,i]01-0s-202s.ri i",iiC'rt;ti,!,i:: #: ::;:!f: ,:;f; Xi*Reddy on basis of ptot aiea1nd dimensions;i;;;;Lr ttocument and ownershipon ground she .has ii; ,"i;;';;;;;'ck instead ofpermrtted 3 feet 3 inches tlward.s prtiiorrrii-rii.llu rssue ,aisetlby Smt.K.Anirha Reddv that 7,.6. the petitioner Sri.L.V.iubrah*onyok "1 [n:, ]i, ,';;:;r;;;is [U"iZrc ][incroached by]the subject!,o,,!.r,o^olnoing [adjudication ][ii ][o.s.uo.s!i ],fzis before theHon'ble [principre ]"li* has already:;'#::,::n::r!! ff";i.rrt:i"t [a"'i' ][to-'ozllis ][tv o,ui,i]01-0s-202s.ri i",iiC'rt;ti,!,i:: #: ::;:!f: ,:;f; Xi*Reddy on basis of ptot aiea1nd dimensions;i;;;;Lr ttocument and ownershipon ground she .has ii; ,"i;;';;;;;'ck instead ofpermrtted 3 feet 3 inches tlward.s prtiiorrrii-rii.llu rssue ,aisetlby Smt.K.Anirha Reddv that 7,.6. the petitioner Sri.L.V.iubrah*onyok "1 [n:, ]i, ,';;:;r;;;is [U"iZrc ][incroached by]the subject!,o,,!.r,o^olnoing [adjudication ][ii ][o.s.uo.s!i ],fzis before theHon'ble [principre ]lunior Cioit n.n.oir-i*.'ii"ce Judge, the mainJudge, the maintssue raised Lry tht petitioner ts at16 regarding ti ai*" arriorior,in this o.s.No.s3s offce will takc of 2023, necessar!.yctio1 * i.1," ,fi", tli "*trr*, of cioil suitregardingthe encroachment madc by the S;.L.V.S:r;i;;;;;;; 3n9r'*rr;;;j;l;;* in the tand!..:*!.K.A.ri,ry [Rlddy ][ind ][atso ]further [ac,,i*"{"iii't, ]initiatedpursuant to the judice construction before the made comietent cruil court.,,Speaking_-or.dei dnted:1_g_2023 bu SmiK.Anitha R";;v-r;;; *ouu in respect i, ,ru_ofin this o.s.No.s3s offce will takc of 2023, necessar!.yctio1 * i.1," ,fi", tli "*trr*, of cioil suitregardingthe encroachment madc by the S;.L.V.S:r;i;;;;;;; 3n9r'*rr;;;j;l;;* in the tand!..:*!.K.A.ri,ry [Rlddy ][ind ][atso ]further [ac,,i*"{"iii't, ]initiatedpursuant to the judice construction before the made comietent cruil court.,,Speaking_-or.dei dnted:1_g_2023 bu SmiK.Anitha R";;v-r;;; *ouu in respect i, ,ru_of Learned standing counsel further pray this Court to close the present contempt case, as the order of this Court passed in Writ petition No.18053 of 2023, dated 12.07.2023 has been complied.

3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits [that]

liberty may be grantedtochallenge proceedingNo.317lTI5/C3/LNZ/GHMC/2023 dated 28.10.2023, if thepetitioner is otherwise aggrieved

4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel oneither side, this Contempt Case is closed, leavhg it open to thepetitioner to pursue their remedies, in accordance with law.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.No order as to cosLs SD/-M/ RAMANA KRISHNADEPUW REGISR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

'1. One CC to SRl. P RADHAKRISHNA, Advocate [OPUCI2. One CC to SRl. M DURGA PRASAD [(SC ]FOR GHMC), [OPUC]3. Two CD Copies ADK

s

HIGH COURT

DATED:2911212023

ORDERCC.No.2120 of 2023

CLOSING THE CCWITHOUT COSTSWITHOUT COSTS

@qoo$k

STAT€?q{i:'i_]ii1i [ [[ ][Ji''L],( DF.