Telangana High Court
CC/1148/2023 of Challuri Venkataramana Vs M.Raghunandan Rao IAS on 29 December 2023
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1148 OF 2023 Contempt Case filed under Sections'10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent
I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREEPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVICONTEMPT CASE NO: 1148 OF 2023
Contempt Case filed under Sections'10 to 12 of Contempt ofCourts Act 1971 to punish the respondent herein for willfully notimplementing the order dt.14.12.2022 in WP.No.2823412021 ,Between:Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent herein for willfully notimplementing the order dt.14.12.2022 in WP.No.2823412021 ,Between:
Challuri Venkataramana, S/o.Ch Nemaji, Aged about 49 years,R/o. H.No. 1 -1 -1 1 41 102, Ravindranagar, Adilabad-504001...PET!TIONERY PETITIONERANDM.Raghunandan Rao lAS, Commissioner of Agriculture,Government of Telangana, Opp. Nizam College, Basheerbagh,Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT*6th RESPONDENT
Gounsel for the Petitioner(s): MRS. VEDULA CHITRALEKHACounsel for the Respondents: ADDL ADVOCATE GENERALThe Court made the following: ORDERThe Court made the following: ORDER
*{,
III)
,ffi
7$I'tt
i{
.i(fr.r
!
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI
Contempt Case No.1148 of 2o23
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petilioner submitted that the orders of this Court dated 14.L2.2O22 passed in Writ petitionNo.28234 of 2O2l have been complied with and therefore, theContempt Case may be closed.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed.However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall atso stand closed.
Sd/- Ch.Venkateswarlu,DEPUTY REGISTRAR+I.t. tf+//TRUE COPY//SECTION OFFICER
iTo,{{1. One CC to Mrs. VEDULA [CHITRALEKHA Advocate ][OPUC]t,l2. Two ccs to ADDL [ADVOCATE GENERAL Advocate ][oUT]I3. Two CD CopiesAA,1ghiY4,'9a]
,1ffi
F-r
t .;ip
HIGH [COURT]
DATED: [2911212023]
1$[E ][srAr]e'(ql,-Jz1 B flAn zulo.t-**D55p41Ct\
ORDER
. CG.No.1148 [of ][2023]
THE CONTEMPT [CASE ][IS]CLOSED - [WITHOUT ][COSTS]
.+^GYT(",(
IE,g'
t{Yryi).I-!ItI!,FffiIlI,!tJ'Il,4i-TIItiI{t.t{,ffir