Telangana High Court
WA/2116/2004 of The Management of Express Publications (Madurai) Ltd., Vs The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, on 29 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO. 2116 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY
WRIT APPEAL NO. 2116 of 2004
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated26/12/2003 in WPMP No.33996 OF 2003 IN WP NO.26846 OF 2003 on the file of the High Court.)
Between:
The Management of Express Publications (Madurai) Ltd., Begumpet Hyderabad
AND
..... APPELLANT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Chandravihar Building M.J. Road, Hyderabad.
2. Mr. K. Raghavendra Reddy R/o 301, Devi Residency Sripuram ColonyHyderabad
.....RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant:MR.S.RAVINDRANATH
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR LABOUR.Counsel for the Respondent No.2: -- The Court at the admission stage made the following Order:(per TMK,J)
This writ appeal is filed against the order of a learned single Judge of this Courtin WPMP.No.33996 of 2003 in W.P.No.26846 of 2003, dated 26.12.2003.
The appellant filed the above WPMP to suspend the proceedings inI.D.No.39 of 2002, dated 07.08.2003 of the first respondent.
Learned counsel for the appellant contended that the order of the learnedSingle Judge amounts to implementation of the award.
We do not find any force in the argument advanced by the learnedcounsel for the appellant in view of the fact that the learned single Judge in theimpugned order observed that the promotion of the second respondent pursuantto the award passed by the Labour Court shall be subject to the result of thewrit petition.
The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
The Registry is directed to post the writ petition for final hearing in thesecond week of March, 2005.
____________________
T.MEENA KUMARI,J
29-12-2004
_________________
S.ANANDA REDDY,J
Lvl/usd
To
1. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Chandravihar Building M.J. Road, Hyderabad.
2. Two CCs to G.P. for Labour, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT).
3. Two CCs to the Section Officer, Writ Posting Section, High Court of A.P.,HyderabadHyderabad
4. Two CD copies