Telangana High Court

WP/4264/2014 of Rabindranath Tagore Educational Society, Vs The Govt of Andhra Pradesh, on 29 December 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION NO: 4264 OF m14 Between: 1. Rabindranath Tagore Educalional Society, Flat No.301, Willmount

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA

WRIT PETITION NO: 4264 OF m14

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in thenature of ["Writ ]of Mandamus" declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in notapproving the admission of the students of the 2nd petitioner institution by issuingproceedings in RC.No.9/N 1-3lDlETl2011 Dated 26-10-2013 as being illegal,arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the [provisions ]of A.P. Educationallnstitutions (Regulation of Admissions and Prohibition of Capitation Fee ) Act,1983 and set aside the said Proceedings issued in RC.No.9/N'1-3/DEf l2O11Dated 26-10-2013 and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith approvethe admission of all the students of the 2''d [petitioner ]institution and [permit ]them to

-7

complete their D.Edcourse without any hindrance and drop all [proceedings ]as aconsequence of such [proceedings.]

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(![,PMP. NO: s260 0F 2014)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court may be [pleased ]to directthe respondents to [permrt ]the students of the 2nd [petitioner ]institution to appearfor the examinations of 1"t [year ]D.Ed Course and all examinations thereafter, bysuspending the [proceedings ]Dated 26.10.2013, [pending ]disposal of the abovewrit petition.

l.A. NO: 2OF 2O14(WPMP. NO: 19258 OF 2014

Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that in the circumstances stated [in]the affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court may be [pleased ]to directthe respondents to declare the results of the ['lst ][year ]D.Ed course and furtherpermit the students to pursue the remaining course pending disposal of the abovewrit petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P PANDU RANGA REDDY

Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION

The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDAWRIT PETITION No.4264 of 2OL4

ORDER:Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and alsoheard learned Government Pleader for SchoolEducation, appearing on behalf of respondents.

PERUSED THE RECORD.

2. The petitioners approached this Court seeking therelief as under:

"to issue an appropriate writ order or directionmore particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamusdeclaring the action of the 2nd respondent in notapproving the admission of the students of the 2ndpetitioner institution by issuing proceedings in RC.No.9/Nl-3/DlEf/2011 Dated 26.10.2013 as being illegal,arbitrary, u nconstitutiona I and contrary to theprovisions of A.P. Educational Institutions (Regulation ofAdmissions and Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1983and set aside the said Proceedings issued in RC,No.9/NL-3/DIET/2011 Dated 26.10.2013 and consequentlydirect the respondents to forthwith approve theadmission of all the students of the 2nd petitionerinstitution and permit them to complete their D.Edcourse without any hindrance and drop all proceedings I

{

t

as a consequence of such [proceedings ]and to pass suchother order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fitand [proper ]in the circumstances of the case. "

3. [t is represented by both the learned counsel for thepetitioners as well as learned Government Pleader for SchoolEducation, appearing for the respondents that, the cause ofaction in the present writ petition does not survive fora dj ud ication .

4. Bringing the said submission Of both the counsel onrecord, the [pr€sent ]writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.However, there shall be no order as to costs.

5. Interim orders granted by this Court on 14.02.2014,shall also stand:; vacated.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, [. ]pending in this WritPetition, shall stand closed.

SD/- P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBAASSISTANT REGI$TRAR\',//TRUE COPYi//4SECTION [OFFTCER]

To,1One CC to [Sri ][P. ][Pandu ][Ran]2iwo CCs to [GP ][for School ][E]S3"5f; Slli-,'tfl ['S:ili[?",.'."J"teorreransana,]at Hyderabad [OUTI3Two CD CoPiesTJGJP^C-'tto I

HIGH COURT

DATED:2911212,023

ORDERWP.No.4264 of 2014

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION

AS INFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS.

Iy\E $TAf(.(,Jzo0 2 [FEB ][202{]o\*kDEspr,Jc'

I

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead