Telangana High Court
CRP/4722/2009 of S.JAGANNATHAM Vs K.SAI KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS on 31 December 2021
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA CIVIL EVISI NPE TION i47 oF 20 I PetitionunderSection22ofA.P.Building(lease,RentandEviction)ControlAct'
IN THE HIGH COURT [FOR ][THE STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY [FIRST ][DAY ][OF DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND [AND ][TWENTY ][ONE]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [SMT ][JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA]
i47oF 20 I
CIVILEVISINPETION
PetitionunderSection22ofA.P.Building(lease,RentandEviction)ControlAct'lg60,aggrievedbytheorderdatedlo/o8i2ooginRANo.84/2008onthefileoftheCourt of the [Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad ][by ][confirming the ][orders]datedOTlO3l2008preferredagainsttheorderdatedoT/03/2ooSpassedinRCNo.22t2007 on [the ][file ][of ][the ][Principle ][Rent ][Controller' Secunderabad']
Between:
S.Jagannatham, [S/o. ][Late S Chandraiah]
...PETITIONERYAPPELLANT/PETITIONER
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. K.Sai Kumar, [S/0. ][Late ][K.Ramachandra ][Rao]z. k Laoadish, k Laoadish, Laoadish, S/o. [[Late ]][[K.Ramachandra ]][[Rao]]z. k Laoadish, k Laoadish, Laoadish, S/o. [[Late ]][[K.Ramachandra ]][[Rao]]
z. k Laoadish, k Laoadish, Laoadish, S/o. [[Late ]][[K.Ramachandra ]][[Rao]]3 P Shzntilal Jai' s/o [t'"''?].*?SroNDENTs/REsPoNDENT./RESPoNDENTS]3 P Shzntilal Jai' s/o [t'"''?].*?SroNDENTs/REsPoNDENT./RESPoNDENTS]
CRPMP. NO: [6484 ][OF 20og]
Petitionundersectionl5lofCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleasedtoissueaninteriminjunction restralning [3d ][respondent ][from ][making ][any ][construction ][on ][the ][schedule]in [RC ][pending ][disposal ][of ][the ][CRP]property mentioned For the Petitioner [: ][SRI ][B.V.SUBBAIAH, ][Advocate]
FortheRespondents:SRlS.GANESHRAo,Advocate(notpresent)
The Court made [the following: ][ORDER]
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHACryIL REVISIONON NO.4722 0F o9
ORD
Petitioner counsel present. Respondent counsel absent.On 17-L2-2O2I, learned counsel for the petitionerrepresented that the building is ready for starting jeweilarybusiness and the land lord also sold away the same and thusthe cause of action does not survive for adjudication.
Posted today for verification of the respondents counsel.But, he is not turned up. As it has already represented bythe respondents counsel.But, he is not turned up. As it has already represented bypetitioner counsel that there is no cause of action to survive,the Civil Revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. Thereshall be no order as to coststhe Civil Revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. Thereshall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this CivilRevision Petition, shall stand closed.
To
//TRUE COPYII
1
4gg giffi [Lt$eil* ]&l'l'$:lila; gg giffi [Lt$eil* ]&l'l'$:lila; 6, ffi KjKj \.;- ,''.
^.'e,SiiN+mbi'5.'#^H(1t,SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:3111212021
ORDERCRP.No.4722 of 2009
OISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS,WITHOUT COSTS.
@F
.sJ