Telangana High Court
WP/28218/2007 of K.Ramesh Vs The State of Andhra pradesh,Department of on 31 December 2007
SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.28218 of 2007 Between: K.Ramesh. .. PETITIONER and The State of A.P. and others. .. RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.28218 of 2007 ORDER: The petitioner questions the order of the 2nd respondent, dated
Between:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH
WRIT PETITION No.28218 of 2007
K.Ramesh. ..PETITIONER
and
The State of A.P. and others.
..
RESPONDENTS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAHWRIT PETITION No.28218 of 2007
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner questions the order of the 2[nd] respondent, dated 03-12-2007, in proceedings No.A6/3710/07-Panchayat-I, in suspending himfrom the post of Sarpanch for a period of three months in terms of Section249(6) of A.P.Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.
Merely because the petitioner is suspended for a period of threemonths, there cannot be any justification on the part of the 2[nd] respondent innot initiating enquiry proceedings.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writpetition is disposed of directing the 2[nd] respondent to complete the enquiry,after giving reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, and pass final orders asexpeditiously as possible within a period of six weeks from the date of receiptof a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
___________
Note:Issue C.C. in two days
(B/o) Prv