Telangana High Court
WP/28171/2007 of N.Anand Babu, Vs The RevenueDivisional Officer, on 28 December 2007
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTYEIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN P R E S E N T THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA * * * WRIT PETITION No.28171 of 2007 Between: N. Anand Babu … Petitioner Versus The
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)FRIDAY, THE TWENTYEIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND SEVENP R E S E N TTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA* * * WRIT PETITION No.28171 of 2007Between:N. Anand Babu … Petitioner VersusThe Joint Collector,Kurnool ,Kurnool district & Anr. … RespondentsCounsel for the Petitioners: Sri KV RAGHUVEERCounsel for the Respondents: GOVT.PLEADER FOR CIVILSUPPLIES
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA* * ** * *
WRIT PETITION No.28171 of 2007
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R :
Heard both the counsel.
2. The writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus, declaring theaction of the second respondent in issuing the ProceedingsRC.BN.1223/2007 dated 17-12-2007 suspending the petitioner’sauthorization of Fair Price Shop, Ward nO.21 as illegal, arbitrary andagainst the principles of natural justice and consequently to set asidethe same and to pass such other suitable orders as this Court maydeems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
3. Several facts had been narrated in paragraph nos. 3, 4 and 5of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition.
4. It is stated that as against the order impugned, an appeal hadbeen preferred before the first respondent on 18-12-2007 along withapplication praying to grant stay and it appears that no orders hadbeen passed.
5. In view of the facts and circumstances, let the first respondentdispose of the appeal within a period of four weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order and till then the impugned order is hereby suspended.
6. The writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. No costs.
JUSTICE P . S .
NARAYANA .
28/12/2007.
NB:
1) Operative Portion of the Order by wire at party’s costs.
2) Furnish CC of the order tomorrow.
B/o. ISL