Telangana High Court

WP/14471/1997 of M.PREETAM Vs THE CONVENOR/MCA CET-97/WARANGAL/ANDANOTHE on 30 December 1997

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 14471 of 2007 Between: N/s SAtish Traders rep. by its Proprietor Mr.G.V.N.Seshu, S/o.Chandrarao,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE EIGTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINIWRIT PETITION NO : 14471 of 2007

Between:

N/s SAtish Traders rep. by its Proprietor Mr.G.V.N.Seshu,S/o.Chandrarao, D.No.65-1-37/A2, Srinivasa Nagar, Opp: Sriharipuram Market Road,Visakhapatnam - 530 011.

..... PETITIONER

AND

1 Andhra University, rep. by its Registrar, Waltair, Visakhapatnam.2 Hi-Power Elevators Pvt. Ltd., H.No. 49-16-11, Flat No.403, IswaryaEnclave, Lalithanagar, Akkayyapalem,Visakhapatnam 530 016.2 Hi-Power Elevators Pvt. Ltd., H.No. 49-16-11, Flat No.403, IswaryaEnclave, Lalithanagar, Akkayyapalem,Visakhapatnam 530 016.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to issue an order, direction or a Writ one in the nature Mandamus,declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not entrusting the contractworks in pursuance of Tender notice 18.5.2007 issued for providingpassenger Elevators at A.U.Guest House and allotting the same to the2nd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, and consequently direct the 1strespondent to allot/entrust the contract work in pursuance of TenderNotice dt. 18.5.2007 issued for providing Passenger Elevators at A.U.Guest House to the Petitioner forthwith, and pass such other relief orreliefs.

Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.A.SRINIVASA SARMA

Counsel for the Respondent No.: (SC FOR AU)M.V.RAJA RAAM

The Court made the following :

Page 1 of 2

THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINIWRIT PETITION No.14471 of 2007

ORDER:

Heard both sides.

Since admittedly, the contract work in pursuance of theimpugned tender notice dated 18.5.2007 was alreadyexecuted, nothing survives for adjudication on merits.

Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, this order shall not preclude the petitioner to workout the appropriate remedy as available under law claimingdamages or any other relief to which he is entitled to. Nocosts.

_______________

Justice G.Rohini

Date:09.06.2009mrb

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead