Telangana High Court
WP/32766/2010 of Mubarak Begum Vs the Commissioner of Police, on 30 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32766 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition is filed with the prayer, which reads as under: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass an order,
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.32766 of2010
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed with the prayer, which reads as under:
“For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, thepetitioner herein prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased topass an order, direction or a writ particularly in the nature of Writof mandamus declaring that the inaction of respondents 1 and 2to hand over the investigation of the case which was registeredby respondent No.3 in the P.S.Langer House vide Crime No.393of 2010 u/S.324 read with 34 IPC to other agency/officer in theinterest of justice.”
Petitioner has lodged a complaint before the Station HouseOfficer, Langer House Police Station, Hyderabad, stating that oneAkbar Nizamuddin and others beat her husband, by name, M.A.Jabbarat Nanal Nagar Cross Road, Hyderabad, and requested to take action.Based on such complaint, a case was registered in Crime No.393 of2010 under Section 324 IPC read with 34 IPC against AkbarNizamuddin and others. It is the case of the petitioner that in view ofinfluence being exerted by the accused in the aforesaid crime,respondents 2 and 3 are insisting her to compromise the matter.
Based on the written instructions, it is submitted by the learnedAssistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for therespondents that pursuant to the crime registered on the complaint ofthe petitioner, the respondents have taken up investigation andexamined the petitioner/complainant as L.W.1 and her husband asL.W.2 and recorded their detailed statements. It is also submitted thatthe matter is under investigation and after investigation, appropriatereport would be filed. At the same time, the respondents have also stated that they are not insisting the petitioner to compromise thematter as alleged and the allegation to that effect is false.
As much as it is stated that the matter is under investigation,recording the statement made by the learned Assistant GovernmentPleader for Home appearing for the respondents that the respondentshave denied the allegation of the petitioner that they are insisting thepetitioner for compromising the matter, I deem it appropriate to directthe respondents to complete the investigation in Crime No.393 of 2010as early as possible, preferably, within a period of eight (8) weeks fromtoday and file appropriate final report before the Court concerned.
Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of.No order as to costs.
_______________________R.SUBHASH REDDY, J
30[th] DECEMBER, 2010.kvni