Telangana High Court

WP/46245/2022 of Uppari Anjaneylu and another Vs The Recovery Officer and another on 29 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO:46245 OF 2022 Between: 1.

[ [3306 ]]

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO

WRIT PETITION NO:46245 OF 2022

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Uppari. AnLangyl-! -S1o Uppal Ranga swamy, age.44 years, Occ. Agriculture, [R/o ][H.No.6/24, B.C.Colony, ][Peddapatli, ][Maldak,t, ][Jogutamba ][cadwat ][Distirct.]2 Uppri ^S^a!y1n1a. S/o Ranga swamy, age.52 year5, Occ. Agriculture, R/oH.No.6-24, B.C.Colony, Peddapatti, Matdtkat, Jogutamba Gadw;t Distirci.H.No.6-24, B.C.Colony, Peddapatti, Matdtkat, Jogutamba Gadw;t Distirci.

...PETITIONERS

AND

1. The Recovery Offrcer and another, Debts Recovery Tribunal-l Hyderabad.

Third Floor. Trivenr Complex, Abrds, Hyderabad-560 001.

2. The Manager, Punjab Nation Bank, Mdhabubnagar Branch, atMahabubnagar.Mahabubnagar.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in thenature of Writ of Mandamus to issue-an appropriate writ order or direction morenature of Writ of Mandamus to issue-an appropriate writ order or direction moreparticularly one-in-the-nature of Writ of Mandamus restraining the respondentsfrom taking any coercive steps including taking physical possession of theSchedule property belongs to the petitioner in vide letter dated 11tOBl2O22 of thefrom taking any coercive steps including taking physical possession of theSchedule property belongs to the petitioner in vide letter dated 11tOBl2O22 of the1st respondent in R.C. No.5'11l2019 in O.A. No.1 3912019.

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tothe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tosuspend the operation of warrant of attachment in R.O.No.5.1 1 t2019 inO.A. No.139/2019, dated 1110812022 issued by the 1st respondent pendingdisposal of the above writ petition.disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petlttoners: SRt G.RAJESHWAR RAOCounsel for the Respondents: --The Court made the following: ORDER

\

HON,BLE [SRI ][JUSTICE ][P.NAVEEN ][RAO]ANDHON,BLE [SRI ][JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS ][RAO]WRIT[PETITIO][N No.][ 46245][ oF ][2022]

ORDER: [(Per ][Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][P ][Naueen ][Ro.o)]

This writ Petition [1s]filed challenging [the ][warrant ][of]of 2OIg [in ][O'A' ][No'139 ][of ][2Ol9']attachment [in ][R'C' ][No'51 ][1]dated [1 ][1.08.2O22 ][issued]by the [Recovery ][Officer' ][Debts]Recovery [Tribunal-I, ][HYderabad']

2. Pursuant [to ][the order ][passed ][in ][O'A' ][No'139 ][of 2019 ][the]Recovery [Oflicer ][passed ][the ][impugned ][order dated tl'O8'2O22]The order [passed ][in ][O'A' ][No' ][139 ][of ][2Oi.9 ][has ][become ][final ][and]the [petitioners ][have ][not ][hled any ][appeal ][against ][the ][said ][order']Without [challenging ][the ][order ][in ][O'A' ][No'139 ][of ][2019' ][the]petitioners [challenged ][the][ warrant ][of attachment' ][Since]petitioners [have ][an ][effective ][and ][efficacious remedy before ][the]Debts [Recovery ][Tribunal under ][Section ][17 ][of ][the ][SARFAESI ][Act']vre a-re [not ][inclined ][to ][entertain ][the ][writ ][petition']

3. Accordingly, [the ][Writ ][Petition is ][dismissed ][without ][costs']it [open ][to ][the petitioners to ][work out their ][remedies ][as]leaving available [in ][larv.]

J

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall standclosed.

SD/.P.CH.NAGABHUSHAMBAASSISTANISEGISTRAR(-rDSECTION OFFICER

///TRUE COPY//

To

1. One CC to SRI G RAJESHWAR RAO, Advocate [OPUC]2. Two CD CopresPSK.

BSW

i1

HIGH COURT

DATED:2911212022

ORDERWP.No.46245 ot 2022

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS.

qc.+rA-9cll [t ]1,5

, STAI /:\ot [1 ][l[\l][ NT]o*.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead