Telangana High Court
CRLP/9633/2022 of Veeresh Pedditi Vs The State of Telangana on 29 December 2022
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9633 OF 2022 Between: 1. Veeresh Pedditi, S/o. Pedditi Narsimha Aged about 33 years, Occ.Agriculture H.No. 2-53
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDERCRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9633 OF 2022
Between:
1. Veeresh Pedditi, S/o. Pedditi Narsimha Aged about 33 years, Occ.AgricultureH.No. 2-53 Bakaram Jagir tv'loinabad, Ranga Reddy DistrictH.No. 2-53 Bakaram Jagir tv'loinabad, Ranga Reddy District
2. Pedditi Eshwaraiah, S/o. Pedditi Chandraiah Aged about 58 years,Occ.Agriculture H.No. 2-53 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy DistrictOcc.Agriculture H.No. 2-53 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District3. Pedditi Kumar, S/o. P. Papaiah Aged about 44 years. Occ.Agriculture H.No.2-52 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District2-52 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District
4. Peddditi Shaker, S/o. P. Papaiah Aged about 43 years, Occ. Service H.No. 2-25 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District25 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District
5. Pedditi Mallesh, S/o Pedditi Narasimha Aged about 39 years, Occ. AgricultureH.No. 2-53 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy DistrictH.No. 2-53 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District
6. Pedditi Raju Mudiraju, Sio. Pedditi Narasimha Aged about 42 years, Occ.Agriculture H.No. 2-53 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy DistrictAgriculture H.No. 2-53 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District
7. Pedditi Shivakumar, S/o. Pedditi Chandraiah Aged about 30 years,Occ.Agriculture H.No. 1-69 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy DistrictOcc.Agriculture H.No. 1-69 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy DistrictB. Pedditi Sathyamma, Wo. Pedditi Eshwaraiah Aged about 44 yearc,Occ.Housewife H.No. 2-53 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy DistrictOcc.Housewife H.No. 2-53 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District
9. Pedditi Bhagya, Wo. Shekar Aged about 34 years, Occ.Housewife H.No. 1-6213 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy Diskict6213 Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy Diskict
10. Pedditi Manjula, Wo. Latesh Mallesh Aged about 47 years, Occ.HousewifeH.No. 1-57, Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy DistrictH.No. 1-57, Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District '1 l.Pedditi Srilaxmi, Wo. Pedditi Raju Aged about 26 years, Occ.HousewifeH.No. 2-53, Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy DistrictH.No. 2-53, Bakaram Jagir Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District
...Petitioner/Accused 1 to 7,10 to 13
AND
1 . The State of Telangana, rep. by SLtb-lnspector Moinabad Police Station,Cyberabad Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy DistrictCyberabad Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District(through Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad)
2. Kavali Bujangam, Sio. Kavali Rangaiah Aged about 45 [years ][Occ. ]AgricultureH.No. 1-274, Bakaram Jagir, Amdapur, K.V. Rangareddy Telangana - 501504H.No. 1-274, Bakaram Jagir, Amdapur, K.V. Rangareddy Telangana - 501504
.,. Res po n de nts/C o m [pla ]inant
Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstancer;stated in the ltr'lemcrandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court ma,,be pleased to quasir the complaint and investigation in FIR No 405 of 2022 dalec2310912022 registered against the Petitioners on the file of Sub-lnspector o'Police, P.S Moinab rd, Cyberabad Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District ancgrant such other relief or reliefs as the Honourable Court deems fit.
l.A. NO:2OF 2022
Petition undei Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstancesstated in the l/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court maybe pleased to stay cf all further proceedings including taking any coercive actionagainst the Petitiont:rs herein in connection with complaint and investigation inFIR No 405 of 2022 dated 23109/2022 on the file of Sub-lnspector of Police, P.SMoinabad, Cyberabzrd Commissionerale, Ranga Reddy District and grant suchother relief or reliefs as the Honourable Court deems fit. .
l.A. NO: 3 OF 2022
Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstancesstated in the Memorandurn of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court maybe pleased to extenc the order daled 0211112022 in lA No. 212022 in CRLP No.963;3120?-2 till disposal of CRLP No 9633/2022
This Petition ccming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum ofGrounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri RAJESHKUMAR HERUR,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional PublicProsecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for theRespondent No.2
The Court made the f()llowing: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDERCRIMINAL PETITION No.9633 OF 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
ihis Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Codeof Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short'Cr.P.C.) by the petitioners-Accused Nos.1 to 7 and 10 to 13 to quash the proceedings againstthem in FIR No.405 of 2022 pending on the file of Station HouseOfficer, Moinabad Police Station, Cyberabad, registered for theoffences [punishable ]under Sections 447,427,34L,504 and 506 ofIndian Penai Cocie.
7. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners - Accused andlearned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent - State.Perused the material on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there arecivil disputes pending in between the petitioners and the 2ndrespondent. He further submits that the 2nd respondent hadappeared in the civil suit i.e. O.S.No.43 of 2016 (new No.1224 of2022) which was filed by the petitioners.For the very same reason, the conrplaints are being filed by the 2nd respondent only toharass these petitioners and to exhort [pressure ]in the civil suit.harass these petitioners and to exhort [pressure ]in the civil suit.
4. The said [pendency ]of civrl suit and other complaints are notin dispute. The case appears to have been launched deliberatelywhile civil suit is [pending.]
5. In the said circumstances, this Court deems this appropriateto direct the Irvestigating Officer in FIR No.405 of 2022 [pending ]onthe file of :itation House Cfficer, Moinabad Police Station,Cyberabad, to conclude the rnvestigation without harassing thesepetitioners or taking any coercive steps against these petitioners,keeping in vierv the antecedents of the case.
6. Accordingiy, the Crimrnal Petition is disposed off. However,the petitionersi are at libercy to move this Court in the event of thepolice filing any charge sheet Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
To,
Sd/- T. JAYASREE/ASSISTAN REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//I 1-.,...SECTION OFFICER
1The ll Additional Junior Civit Judge-cum-Xlll Additional MetropolitanMagistrate, Cyoerabad at RajenCranagar.Magistrate, Cyoerabad at RajenCranagar.2The Station Housg 9ff1..r, Moinabad Police Station, Cyberabad 3Two CCs to th,e Public Prosecr.rtor, High Court for the State of Telangana atl-{vrlerabad. (O,JT)l-{vrlerabad. (O,JT)
4One CC to SRl. RAJESH KUMAR HERUR, Advocate tOpUCltTwo CD CopiestTwo CD Copies KAM ,/-k+'
HIGH COURI
KSJ
DATED:29l1ir-l2022
ORDERCRLP.No.963.J of 2022
DISPOSING OF TTIE CRI]\{INAL PBTITION
1[HE ][ST4]14:('t(,)21 2m,tp,!,l a*dSF.^.fC\[r'::)]